RbiSearchHeader

Press escape key to go back

Past Searches

Theme
Theme
Text Size
Text Size
S2

RbiAnnouncementWeb

RBI Announcements
RBI Announcements

Asset Publisher

83652023

III. The External Sector

Despite a surge in exports and higher net invisibles receipts, the current account deficit (CAD) increased during Q1 of 2011-12 reflecting strong import growth on account of higher oil prices and sharp increase in imports of gold & silver, machinery and electronics. The composition of capital inflows shifted with a sharp fall in FII inflows and rise in FDI. The uncertainties associated with the sovereign debt problem in the euro area and the slowdown in the US could pose challenges for India’s external sector. The external sector outlook, though stable in the baseline scenario, will require close monitoring with a greater emphasis on encouraging FDI inflows.

Widening CAD poses risks amidst uncertain global conditions

III.1 Although merchandise export growth outpaced import growth, CAD surged during Q1 of 2011-12 in absolute terms, reflecting sharp increase in imports of oil, gold, silver, machinery and electronics. The wider CAD was financed comfortably with an improvement in capital flows, particularly on account of a marked increase in FDI inflows. Going forward, the external sector is expected to remain manageable although the upside risks to CAD have increased arising from slowing global economy and debt-related stress in euro area, in particular.

Trade deficit widened in spite of high export growth

III.2 Merchandise exports grew at a higher than anticipated rate during April-September 2011 reflecting continued diversification in terms of commodities as well as export destinations. The rise in exports was particularly on account of engineering goods (103 per cent) and petroleum & oil products (53 per cent). However, during this period, there was a sharp rise in imports as well, which led to the widening of the trade deficit. The high growth in imports stemmed from an increase in oil imports (42 per cent) and non-oil import items, viz., gold and silver (80 per cent), machinery (34 per cent), electronics (33 per cent) and organic and inorganic chemicals (26 per cent). Notably, nonoil trade deficit remained unchanged in nominal terms (Table III.1 and Chart III.1).

Exports may slowdown ahead in a tougher climate

III.3 India’s export growth has shown unexpected buoyancy in recent months, despite the slowdown in advanced economies (AEs) and rising global uncertainty (Table III.2). This, among others, was a reflection of the continued diversification of India’s exports to other emerging and developing economies (EDEs) where growth buoyancy was still intact as also the domestic trade policies intended to support exports. However, the slowing of AEs, with some weakening of growth prospects of EDEs, may weigh on India’s exports in subsequent months.

Table III.1: India’s Merchandise Trade

(US$ billion)

Item

2009-10 (R)

2010-11 (P)

April-September (P)

2010-11

2011-12

Absolute

Growth (%)

Absolute

Growth (%)

Absolute

Growth (%)

Absolute

Growth (%)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Exports

178.8

-2.2

254.4

42.3

105.4

30.1

160.0

51.8

Oil

28.2

2.3

41.9

48.7

17.7

63.9

27.0

52.5

Non-oil

150.6

-3.0

212.5

41.1

87.7

24.9

133.0

51.7

Imports

288.4

-3.5

352.6

22.3

167.2

30.5

233.5

39.7

Oil

87.1

-7.0

106.1

21.7

49.4

31.7

70.4

42.5

Non-oil

201.3

-1.9

246.5

22.5

117.8

29.9

163.1

38.5

Trade Deficit

-109.6

-5.5

-98.2

-10.4

-61.8

30.9

-73.5

18.9

Non-oil Trade Deficit

-50.6

1.4

-34.0

-32.8

-30.1

46.8

-30.1

0.0

R: Revised.              P: Provisional.
Source : DGCI&S.


1

Global trade may decelerate on weakening global demand and rising risk aversion

III.4 The growth in global trade has remained volatile reflecting the uncertain global environment (Chart III.2). Both the IMF and the WTO have projected a lower growth in world trade volume reflecting weakening global demand. The IMF has reduced its earlier forecast for world goods and services trade from 8.2 per cent to 7.5 per cent for 2011 and further to 5.8 per cent for 2012. The WTO has lowered its forecast for merchandise trade volume growth to 5.8 per cent in 2011 from its previous estimate of 6.5 per cent.

Growth in services exports may also decelerate

III.5 The surplus on account of invisibles continued to finance around 60 per cent of the merchandise trade deficit in Q1 of 2011-12. Within services, export of software services continued to grow in Q1, though at a lower rate than during the previous quarter. Private transfers, representing workers’ remittances from abroad, remained marginally higher in Q1 than in the corresponding quarter of the previous year despite uncertainties in source countries. The decline in investment income, reflecting lower interest rates abroad, also impacted the overall net receipts on account of invisibles (Table III.3). In the coming quarters, a slowdown in the US and the euro area may have some impact for exports of invisibles, particularly software services, as was evident during Q4 of 2008-09 to Q2 of 2009-10.

Table III.2: India’s Balance of Payments

(US $ billion)

 

2009-10  (PR)

2010-11 (P)

2010-11

2011-12

Q1(PR)

Q2(PR)

Q3(PR)

Q4(PR)

Q1(P)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

1.

Exports

182.2

250.5

55.3

52.0

65.9

77.2

80.6

2.

Imports

300.6

380.9

87.2

89.3

97.4

107.1

116.1

3.

Trade Balance (1-2)

-118.4

-130.5

-31.9

-37.3

-31.5

-29.9

-35.5

4.

Net Invisibles

80.0

86.2

19.8

20.5

21.5

24.5

21.3

5.

Current Account Balance (3+4)

-38.4

-44.3

-12.1

-16.8

-10.0

-5.4

-14.2

6.

Gross Capital Inflows

345.7

496.0

94.5

112.1

173.7

115.7

127.3

7.

Gross Capital Outflows

292.3

436.3

77.7

90.8

160.3

107.5

106.4

8.

Net Capital Account (6-7)

53.4

59.7

16.8

21.4

13.4

8.2

20.9

9.

Overall Balance (5+8)#

13.4

13.0

3.7

3.3

4.0

2.0

5.4

#: Overall balance also includes errors and omissions apart from items 5 and 8.
P: Provisional.         PR: Partially Revised.


2

Sharp decline in FII flows largely offset by strong FDI flows in Q2 of 2011-12

III.6 So far in 2011-12, capital inflows have exhibited an uptrend, mainly on account of robust FDI inflows and rise in external commercial borrowings (ECBs) and trade credit. FDI inflows were almost double the level recorded during the corresponding period of 2010-11 while ECBs also registered healthy growth (Table III.4). However, net FII inflows have not only been volatile but also significantly low up to October 14, 2011. Volatility in FII inflows witnessed in Q2 mainly reflected concerns of a double-dip recession in the US and a worsening debt crisis in the euro area. During Q1 of 2011-12, the surplus on capital account at US$ 20.9 billion was more than adequate for financing the higher CAD at US$ 14.5 billion (Table III.5).

Table III.3: Net Invisibles

(US $ billion)

Item

April-March

April-June

2009-10 (PR)

2010-11 (P)

2010-11 (PR)

2011-12 (P)

1

2

3

4

5

A. Services

35.7

47.7

9.6

12.1

Of which

 

 

 

 

Travel

2.5

4.0

0.6

0.1

Transportation

-0.8

0.4

0.0

0.1

Software

48.2

56.8

12.5

14.2

Business Services

-6.7

-3.8

-1.1

-1.0

Financial Services

-0.9

-1.0

-0.2

-0.5

B. Transfers (Private)

52.1

53.4

13.1

13.7

C. Income

-8.0

-14.9

-2.9

-4.3

Investment Income

-7.2

-13.9

-2.6

-4.2

Compensation of employee

-0.8

-1.0

-0.3

-0.1

Invisibles (A+B+C)

 80.0

86.2

19.8

21.3

P: Provisional.         PR: Partially Revised.


Table III.4: Capital Flows in 2011-12 so far

(US $ billion)

Component

Period

2010-11

2011-12

1

2

3

4

FDI to India

April-August

11.7

21.0

FIIs (net)

April-Oct. 14

27.5

0.6

ADRs/GDRs

April-August

1.5

0.3

ECB Approvals

April-August

7.5

15.9

NRI Deposits (net)

April-August

1.9

2.1

FDI : Foreign Direct Investment.
FII : Foreign Institutional Investment.
ECB : External Commercial Borrowings.
NRI : Non Resident Indians.
ADR : American Depository Receipts.
GDR : Global Depository Receipts.

Overall capital flows to emerging markets entering an uncertain phase

III.7 EDEs are facing a general rise in volatility of capital flows with resurfacing of global downside risks and even the possibility of a reversal of such flows under extreme circumstances cannot be ruled out. The possibility of contagion from the euro area banking system to the EDEs remains high. This can operate through adverse impact on the balance sheets of the subsidiaries of European banks operating in the EDEs and due to investment funds liquidating their positions because of any losses on assets in AEs. Going forward, in context of India, buoyancy in FDI inflows may continue during the second half of 2011-12, as projects attracting significant FDI are already in the pipeline. Uncertainty remains, however, regarding portfolio flows, which are by nature volatile.

Debt creating capital flows also uncertain in spite of widening interest rate differential

III.8 During 2011-12 so far, ECBs registered healthy growth and NRI deposits also showed marginal increase. The ECB policy was further rationalised and liberalised in September 2011. The increase in the annual limit for eligible borrowers under the automatic route may help in sustaining the uptrend in ECBs in the coming quarters of 2011-12. However, euro imbroglio, if continues, may affect the availability and cost of debt creating flows.

Table III.5: Net Capital Flows

(US $ billion)

Item

April-March

April-June

2009-10 (PR)

2010-11 (P)

2010-11 (P)

2011-12 (P)

1

2

3

4

5

Net Capital flows

53.4

59.7

16.8

20.9

Of which

 

 

 

 

1. Foreign Direct Investment

18.8

7.1

2.9

7.2

Inward FDI

33.1

23.4

6.1

12.9

Outward FDI

-14.4

-16.2

-3.2

-5.7

2. Portfolio Investment

32.4

30.3

4.6

2.5

Of which:

 

 

 

 

FIIs

29.0

29.4

3.5

2.5

ADR/GDRs

3.3

2.0

1.1

0.3

3. External Assistance

2.9

4.9

2.5

0.4

4. External Commercial Borrowings

2.8

11.9

2.2

2.9

5. NRI Deposits

2.9

3.2

1.1

1.2

6. Short-term Trade Credit

7.6

11.0

4.3

3.1

P: Preliminary.     PR: Partially Revised.

Rupee sees significant nominal and real depreciation in Q2 of 2011-12

III.9 Based on narrow as well as broad currency baskets (i.e., 6, 30 and 36 currency baskets), the Indian rupee depreciated sharply over end-March 2011 both in nominal and real terms (Table III.6).

Table III.6: Nominal and Real Effective Exchange Rates-Trade Based

(Base: 2004-05=100)

(Per cent, appreciation+/depreciation-)

 

Index Oct. 14, 2011 P

Year-on-Year Variation (Average)

2011-12 (P) (Oct. 14 over end-Mar.)

2008-09

2009- 10 P

2010-11 P

1

2

3

4

5

6

36-REER

99.5

-9.9

-3.1

7.9

-4.1

36-NEER

85.5

-10.9

-2.6

2.9

-8.0

30-REER

92.4

-10.2

-4.6

4.5

-2.0

30-NEER

87.9

-8.4

-2.2

1.1

-7.1

6-REER

109.7

-9.3

-0.3

13.0

-6.3

6-NEER

82.7

-13.6

-3.7

5.6

-9.0

`/USD (Average)

45.3

-12.4

-3.2

4.0

1.7#

`/USD (end-March)

49.1*

-21.5

12.9

1.1

-9.1

NEER: Nominal Effective Exchange Rate.               REER: Real Effective Exchange Rate.      P: Provisional. *: As on October 18, 2011.           #: Apr. – Sept. 2011 over Apr. – Sept. 2010.
Note: Rise in indices indicates appreciation of the rupee and vice versa.

External vulnerability indicators portray a mixed picture

III.10 India’s external debt stock as at end-June 2011 showed an increase of US$10.4 billion over the level as at end-March 2011 mainly on account of ECBs reflecting interest rate differential and short-term trade credit reflecting surge in imports (Table III.7).

III.11 The key debt sustainability indicators, such as ratio of short-term debt to total external debt, ratio of short-term debt to reserves, and debt service ratio marginally worsened due to the continued dominance of debt creating flows. However, other indicators, viz., reserves cover for imports and debt service payments improved during Q1 of 2011-12 (Table III.8). Going forward, debt flows may increase further due to persistence of interest rate differentials, higher annual ceiling for ECBs under the automatic route for corporates in specified sectors and liberalisation of investment by FIIs in corporate bonds for the infrastructure sector.

Table III.7: India’s External Debt

(US$ billion)

Item

End-March 2010 PR

End-March 2011 P

End-June 2011 P

Variation (End-June 2011
over End-March 2011)

Amount

Per cent

1

2

3

4

5

6

1. Multilateral

42.9

48.5

49.4

0.9

1.9

2. Bilateral

22.6

25.8

26.3

0.5

1.9

3. International Monetary Fund

6.0

6.3

6.4

0.1

0.9

4. Trade Credit (above 1 year)

16.9

18.6

18.7

0.1

0.3

5. External Commercial Borrowings

70.8

88.9

93.2

4.3

4.8

6. NRI Deposits

47.9

51.7

52.9

1.2

2.4

7. Rupee Debt

1.7

1.6

1.6

0.0

-2.1

8. Long-term (1 to 7)

208.7

241.5

248.4

6.9

2.9

9. Short-term

52.3

65.0

68.5

3.5

5.4

Total (8+9)

261.0

306.4

316.9

10.5

3.4

P: Provisional.         PR: Partially Revised.

External sector outlook, although stable, warrants close monitoring

III.12 With progressive diversification both in terms of commodities as well as destinations, exports during the year so far (up to September 2011) have grown faster than imports and net services also continue to grow albeit at moderate pace. However, owing to increasing uncertainty in growth prospects of US and European economies, the growth momentum in exports seen so far may not be sustained and growth in services exports may also remain moderate in the coming months. While uncertain global economic and financial prospects underpinned volatile international price of crude oil, some moderation in prices due to downward revision in global oil demand in coming period may provide some relief.

III.13Trends in capital inflows so far suggest that the economy has received sufficient flows to finance CAD during the first half of 2011- 12. Although there has been a marked decline in net FII flows, a significant pick up in FDI inflows augurs well from the sustainability point of view. Going forward, capital flows into India will depend on how the economic and financial conditions in AEs, particularly the US and the euro area, evolve during the second half and whether relative growth and interest rate differential would suffice to outweigh the general risk perception among foreign investors. It is, therefore, important to encourage FDI inflows to impart stability to India’s capital account. Overall, the balance of payments outlook for 2011-12, although stable, warrants close monitoring.

Table III.8: External Sector Vulnerability Indicators

(Per cent)

Indicator

End-March 2010

End-June 2010

End-March 2011

End-June 2011

1

2

3

4

5

1. Ratio of Total Debt to GDP

18.0

17.4

2. Ratio of Short-term to Total Debt (Original Maturity)

20.0

21.2

21.2

21.6

3. Ratio of Short-term to Total Debt (Residual Maturity)

41.2

42.5

42.2

43.3

4. Ratio of Concessional Debt to Total Debt

16.8

15.9

15.5

15.1

5. Ratio of Reserves to Total Debt

106.9

98.0

99.5

99.6

6. Ratio of Short-term Debt to Reserves

18.8

21.0

21.3

21.7

7. Reserves Cover for Imports (in months)

11.1

10.7

9.6

10.0

8. Reserves Cover for Imports and Debt Service Payments (in months)

10.5

10.1

9.2

9.5

9. Debt Service Ratio (Debt Service Payments to Current Receipts)

5.5

4.2

4.2

4.6

RbiTtsCommonUtility

PLAYING
LISTEN

Related Assets

RBI-Install-RBI-Content-Global

RbiSocialMediaUtility

Install the RBI mobile application and get quick access to the latest news!

Scan Your QR code to Install our app

RbiWasItHelpfulUtility

Was this page helpful?