Statement 6: Financing of Gross Fiscal Deficit - As per cent of Total – 2021-22 (Accounts) - RBI - Reserve Bank of India
104531400
Published on December 11, 2023
Statement 6: Financing of Gross Fiscal Deficit – As per cent of Total – 2021-22 (Accounts)
(Per cent) | ||||||||||||
State/UT | Market Borrowings | Loans from Centre | Special Securities issued to NSSF | Loans from LIC, NABARD, NCDC, SBI and other Banks | Provident Funds, etc. | Reserve Funds | Deposits and Advances | Suspense and Miscellaneous | Remittances | Others | Overall Surplus (–)/ Deficit (+) | Gross Fiscal Surplus (–)/ Deficit (+) (Col.2 to 12) |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
1. Andhra Pradesh | 144.3 | 14.0 | -4.7 | 3.8 | 14.8 | 3.7 | -65.9 | -5.8 | 0.0 | -0.1 | -4.3 | 100.0 |
2. Arunachal Pradesh | 48.1 | 31.3 | 10.0 | 13.1 | 51.9 | 47.1 | -3.6 | 2.0 | -3.2 | -0.3 | -96.4 | 100.0 |
3. Assam | 59.4 | 3.3 | -4.2 | 4.2 | 3.3 | -0.3 | 0.3 | 10.9 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 22.9 | 100.0 |
4. Bihar | 96.0 | 32.9 | -7.4 | 3.2 | 0.3 | 0.5 | -6.3 | -0.6 | 0.0 | -0.6 | -18.1 | 100.0 |
5. Chhattisgarh | 16.4 | 91.2 | -7.5 | 3.9 | 0.0 | 7.4 | -3.4 | 1.1 | -0.1 | -1.4 | -7.7 | 100.0 |
6. Goa | 55.3 | 35.0 | -9.0 | 15.6 | -0.9 | 0.2 | 2.8 | -5.1 | -3.1 | 0.0 | 9.2 | 100.0 |
7. Gujarat | 59.7 | 56.2 | -16.0 | -0.7 | -1.2 | 3.1 | -0.3 | 10.9 | 0.4 | 0.0 | -12.2 | 100.0 |
8. Haryana | 76.0 | 23.2 | -3.1 | 8.0 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 7.1 | 0.8 | 0.0 | -10.8 | -3.5 | 100.0 |
9. Himachal Pradesh | 35.7 | 66.5 | -10.9 | 3.3 | 9.2 | -14.2 | -0.7 | 20.3 | 2.1 | -0.4 | -11.1 | 100.0 |
10. Jharkhand | 143.8 | 115.6 | -29.5 | 13.7 | -7.4 | -14.6 | -27.7 | -0.8 | -0.5 | -28.8 | -63.7 | 100.0 |
11. Karnataka | 74.7 | 28.6 | -2.5 | 0.8 | 5.4 | 4.7 | 4.3 | -0.2 | -0.2 | 0.0 | -15.5 | 100.0 |
12. Kerala | 39.4 | 18.9 | 5.9 | -0.8 | 40.1 | -0.6 | 3.9 | -0.4 | -0.9 | -0.4 | -5.1 | 100.0 |
13. Madhya Pradesh | 37.1 | 28.9 | 11.0 | 3.0 | -1.6 | 12.1 | -3.1 | 3.0 | 4.3 | 3.0 | 2.2 | 100.0 |
14. Maharashtra | 63.4 | 27.2 | -8.4 | 2.6 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 11.1 | -0.9 | 0.0 | -0.6 | 100.0 |
15. Manipur | 67.6 | 11.8 | -3.0 | 5.4 | 0.2 | -0.8 | 3.4 | -0.7 | -2.3 | 0.7 | 17.6 | 100.0 |
16. Meghalaya | 60.1 | 22.7 | -2.5 | 3.2 | 6.8 | 1.4 | 1.1 | -2.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 9.5 | 100.0 |
17. Mizoram | 120.1 | 77.0 | -4.6 | 13.2 | 78.5 | 3.9 | -101.9 | -92.4 | -40.3 | -1.1 | 47.5 | 100.0 |
18. Nagaland | 469.1 | 113.1 | -5.0 | -2.9 | -103.2 | 6.2 | -21.1 | -35.2 | -65.4 | -17.5 | -238.0 | 100.0 |
19. Odisha | 31.4 | -31.6 | 4.3 | -3.9 | -1.5 | -16.1 | -3.6 | -0.9 | -0.1 | 33.0 | 89.0 | 100.0 |
20. Punjab | 48.2 | 43.4 | -6.6 | -2.8 | 0.1 | 3.3 | 3.2 | -1.6 | 0.0 | -3.5 | 16.3 | 100.0 |
21. Rajasthan | 93.6 | 17.0 | -3.3 | 0.9 | 5.1 | -5.8 | 15.5 | -0.2 | 0.0 | -14.5 | -8.3 | 100.0 |
22. Sikkim | 162.7 | 32.3 | -1.8 | 2.0 | 10.8 | -8.0 | 1.6 | 1.7 | -15.9 | -0.3 | -85.3 | 100.0 |
23. Tamil Nadu | 88.6 | 15.0 | -2.2 | 2.2 | 3.3 | 0.3 | 5.1 | -0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -12.2 | 100.0 |
24. Telangana | 84.2 | 9.2 | -1.8 | 1.2 | 2.3 | -3.5 | 2.6 | 1.6 | 1.3 | -0.7 | 3.6 | 100.0 |
25. Tripura | 0.0 | -741.3 | 178.8 | -24.6 | -454.9 | -222.2 | 292.0 | -29.4 | 38.5 | 0.0 | 1,063.2 | 100.0 |
26. Uttar Pradesh | 120.6 | 23.7 | -13.2 | 1.7 | 1.4 | 4.9 | -3.8 | 3.8 | 0.1 | -11.0 | -28.1 | 100.0 |
27. Uttarakhand | 48.2 | 97.2 | -29.7 | -6.2 | 8.9 | -12.5 | -18.2 | 7.4 | 0.3 | 6.0 | -1.4 | 100.0 |
28. West Bengal | 89.5 | 14.2 | -12.5 | -0.2 | 3.8 | -0.1 | 4.2 | -0.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.7 | 100.0 |
29. Jammu and Kashmir | 50.1 | 33.4 | 41.7 | 0.2 | -5.3 | 1.3 | 3.0 | 1.2 | -12.0 | -2.1 | -11.5 | 100.0 |
30. NCT Delhi | 0.0 | 99.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 100.0 |
31. Puducherry | -1,875.0 | 173.1 | 166.1 | 48.0 | -134.3 | 33.4 | -84.2 | 349.1 | 0.0 | 309.7 | 1,114.1 | 100.0 |
All States and UTs | 77.8 | 27.2 | -3.9 | 1.9 | 5.7 | 1.7 | 0.6 | 2.0 | -0.1 | -3.5 | -9.2 | 100.0 |
‘–’: Nil/Negligible. Note: (1) Same as in Appendix Table 9. (2) ‘Others’ include Loans from other institutions, compensation bonds appropriation to contingency fund, inter-state settlement and contingency fund. (3) In case of Tripura and Manipur the contribution of respective component needs to be seen in light of surplus GFD; for both these states the positive sign of a component represent positive contribution whereas a negative sign represent a negative contribution in reduction of GFD. Source: Budget documents of the State governments. Details in methodology. |
PLAYING
LISTEN
Was this page helpful?