Statement 6: Financing of Gross Fiscal Deficit - As per cent of Total - 2018-19 (Accounts) - આરબીઆઈ - Reserve Bank of India
83867241
પ્રકાશિત તારીખ ઑક્ટોબર 27, 2020
Statement 6: Financing of Gross Fiscal Deficit - As per cent of Total - 2018-19 (Accounts)
(Per cent) | ||||||||||||
State/UT | Market Borrowings | Loans from Centre | Special Securities issued to NSSF | Loans from LIC, NABARD, NCDC, SBI and other Banks | Provident Funds, etc. | Reserve Funds | Deposits and Advances | Suspense and Miscellaneous | Remittances | Others | Overall Surplus (-)/ Deficit (+) | Gross Fiscal Surplus (-)/Deficit (+) (Col.2 to 12) |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
1. Andhra Pradesh | 67.2 | 3.5 | -3.3 | 1.9 | 8.7 | 3.4 | 26.3 | -0.2 | -2.8 | -0.2 | -4.6 | 100.0 |
2. Arunachal Pradesh | 38.6 | -1.3 | 0.4 | 10.2 | 22.9 | -1.0 | -20.5 | -17.6 | 114.8 | -0.4 | -46.2 | 100.0 |
3. Assam | 169.3 | -1.1 | -14.8 | 17.5 | 20.5 | 2.2 | 24.1 | 21.2 | -1.2 | - | -137.7 | 100.0 |
4. Bihar | 79.0 | 11.6 | -13.2 | 5.4 | 2.0 | - | 2.4 | -5.9 | 0.6 | - | 18.1 | 100.0 |
5. Chhattisgarh | 155.6 | 4.4 | -5.4 | 4.9 | 9.1 | 0.8 | -2.8 | -0.3 | -1.5 | -0.1 | -64.8 | 100.0 |
6. Goa | 102.6 | -1.2 | -11.0 | -0.8 | 5.9 | 1.3 | 6.7 | 4.3 | 3.3 | -0.4 | -10.8 | 100.0 |
7. Gujarat | 104.1 | 5.6 | -13.4 | 8.8 | 0.8 | -1.7 | 7.6 | -2.8 | -1.3 | - | -7.8 | 100.0 |
8. Haryana | 82.0 | -0.3 | -4.5 | 1.6 | 5.3 | 2.5 | 6.1 | -0.3 | 0.8 | -0.8 | 7.6 | 100.0 |
9. Himachal Pradesh | 60.2 | -0.5 | -15.4 | 6.6 | 31.8 | -0.2 | 11.3 | 0.0 | 3.2 | -0.8 | 3.7 | 100.0 |
10. Jharkhand | 64.3 | 1.7 | -10.1 | 21.2 | 1.1 | 6.1 | 23.9 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 8.7 | -19.9 | 100.0 |
11. Karnataka | 83.7 | 0.3 | -4.2 | 0.4 | 8.6 | 0.3 | 8.0 | -15.8 | -0.1 | - | 18.9 | 100.0 |
12. Kerala | 51.9 | -0.9 | 3.9 | -0.6 | 35.7 | 6.8 | 1.5 | -2.8 | -0.2 | 2.3 | 2.5 | 100.0 |
13. Madhya Pradesh | 69.4 | 12.2 | 5.0 | 1.7 | 10.4 | 0.1 | 0.8 | -3.1 | -4.0 | -0.6 | 8.1 | 100.0 |
14. Maharashtra | 90.7 | -2.6 | -23.1 | 16.5 | 2.1 | -5.9 | 18.8 | -16.2 | 0.7 | -77.6 | 96.5 | 100.0 |
15. Manipur | 72.7 | -4.8 | -5.8 | 13.9 | -1.7 | -0.4 | -5.9 | -2.8 | -5.1 | -0.2 | 40.1 | 100.0 |
16. Meghalaya | 42.6 | 0.1 | -2.4 | 5.7 | 8.9 | 0.2 | 1.3 | -0.8 | 0.1 | -0.1 | 44.5 | 100.0 |
17. Mizoram | -34.9 | -3.1 | -4.6 | -0.9 | -102.3 | -0.8 | 138.7 | 6.0 | -24.5 | 12.3 | 114.1 | 100.0 |
18. Nagaland | 32.8 | -1.6 | -1.2 | -0.3 | 57.0 | 0.0 | 8.1 | -3.6 | 0.2 | -1.0 | 9.6 | 100.0 |
19. Odisha | 44.3 | 2.2 | -8.4 | 21.3 | 17.2 | -9.1 | 41.4 | -0.5 | 0.1 | -14.0 | 5.4 | 100.0 |
20. Punjab | 106.2 | 5.9 | -11.2 | -6.9 | 7.9 | 5.5 | 1.8 | -1.0 | 0.1 | -0.4 | -7.9 | 100.0 |
21. Rajasthan | 77.8 | 5.4 | -4.5 | 0.3 | 15.6 | -0.5 | 11.8 | -0.2 | 0.0 | -18.3 | 12.6 | 100.0 |
22. Sikkim | 123.8 | -0.8 | -2.3 | -0.7 | 14.6 | 0.8 | 2.4 | 18.6 | -20.3 | -0.1 | -35.9 | 100.0 |
23. Tamil Nadu | 68.2 | 2.4 | -3.8 | 2.5 | 5.2 | -1.2 | 15.7 | -6.4 | 0.4 | - | 16.8 | 100.0 |
24. Telangana | 82.3 | -1.5 | -3.0 | 2.8 | 3.1 | 1.7 | 11.5 | -2.4 | 0.4 | 1.9 | 3.2 | 100.0 |
25. Tripura | 103.5 | -1.4 | -8.6 | -3.2 | 34.5 | 10.9 | 4.2 | -23.1 | -16.5 | - | -0.4 | 100.0 |
26. Uttar Pradesh | 94.6 | -2.4 | -13.8 | 9.0 | 10.4 | 38.5 | 6.2 | 0.6 | 0.9 | -0.2 | -43.8 | 100.0 |
27. Uttarakhand | 72.3 | 0.8 | -5.6 | 3.8 | 12.2 | 1.5 | -0.2 | 2.4 | 9.3 | 1.5 | 2.1 | 100.0 |
28. West Bengal | 90.9 | 0.4 | -18.3 | - | 3.4 | 3.2 | 17.1 | -4.3 | 0.0 | - | 7.7 | 100.0 |
29. Jammu and Kashmir | 37.3 | -0.9 | -2.5 | - | 40.3 | 2.4 | 4.2 | 3.1 | 15.2 | -0.2 | 1.1 | 100.0 |
30. NCT Delhi | 0.0 | 33.8 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 4.0 | 62.2 | 100.0 |
31. Puducherry | 157.3 | -33.7 | - | -8.0 | 8.4 | -7.0 | -8.8 | -182.6 | -1.8 | 6.4 | 169.7 | 100.0 |
All States and UTs | 80.6 | 1.9 | -7.3 | 3.9 | 10.3 | 3.8 | 11.1 | -3.8 | 0.7 | -5.3 | 4.0 | 100.0 |
'-' : Nil/Negligible. Note: (1) Same as in Appendix Table 9. (2) 'Others' include Loans from other institutions, compensation bonds appropriation to contingency fund, inter-state settlement and contingency fund. (3) In case of Tripura and Manipur the contribution of respective component needs to be seen in light of surplus GFD; for both these states the positive sign of a component represent positive contribution whereas a negative sign represent a negative contribution in reduction of GFD. Source : Budget documents of the state governments. Details in methodology. |
प्ले हो रहा है
સાંભળો
શું આ પેજ ઉપયોગી હતું?