No. For the purpose of the Scheme, an OBU in India is not treated as an overseas branch of a bank in India.

Yes, Reserve Bank on an application will permit the individual employees/directors of an Indian promoter company engaged in the field of software for acquisition of shares of a JV/WOS abroad provided -the consideration for purchase does not exceed US$ 10,000 or its equivalent per employee in a block of five calendar years,the shares so acquired do not exceed 5% of the paid-up capital of the Joint Venture or Wholly Owned Subsidiary outside India, andafter allotment of such shares, the percentage of shares held by the Indian promoter company, together with shares allotted to its employees is not less than the percentage of shares held by the Indian promoter company prior to such allotment.Further, Reserve Bank may also on an application made to it by an Indian company engaged in the field of software allow its resident employees (including working directors) to purchase foreign securities under the ADR/GDR linked stock option scheme provided the consideration for purchase does not exceed US$ 50,000 or its equivalent in a block of five calendar years.

Yes. For a period not exceeding one year against the expected equity flows/issues as also against the expected proceeds of Non-convertible Debentures, External Commercial Borrowings, Global Depository Receipts and/or funds in the nature of Foreign Direct Investments, provided the bank is satisfied that the borrowing company has made firm arrangements for raising the aforesaid resources/funds. Such loans are required to be accommodated within the ceiling of 5% of outstanding advances of the previous year.

A. The requirement that Promoters / Promoter Group should have a past record of sound credentials and integrity as a part of ‘Fit and Proper’ criteria is a matter of overall judgment and no indicative criteria can be spelt out. [para 2 (B) of the guidelines]

Ans. Yes, it is mandatory for a PPI issuer to allow interoperability. It is mandatory for the PPI issuer to give the holders of full-KYC PPIs interoperability through authorised card networks and UPI. All modes of acceptance (including QR codes) and PPI issuance are required to be interoperable by March 31, 2022.

Reserve Bank has given general permission to mutual funds approved by SEBI to purchase foreign securities, subject to such terms and conditions as may be stipulated.

The loans to individuals against the security of shares, debentures and PSU bonds if held in physical form should not exceed the limit of Rs.10 lakhs per borrower and Rs.20 lakhs if the securities are held in dematerialized form. The maximum amount of finance that can be granted to an individual for IPOs is Rs.10 lakh. The corporates should not be extended finance for investment in other companies’ IPOs and NBFCs should not be provided finance for further lending to individuals for IPOs. Finance extended by a bank for IPOs should be reckoned as an exposure to capital market.

A. No. NOFHC is to be wholly-owned by the Promoters/Promoter Group. Therefore, it cannot be a listed company. [para 2 (C) (i) of the guidelines]

ಉತ್ತರ. ಇಂಟರ್ಆಪರೇಬಿಲಿಟಿಯನ್ನು ಕೆವೈಸಿ ಕಂಪ್ಲೈಟ್ ಪಿಪಿಐಗಳಿಗಾಗಿ ಮಾತ್ರ ಅನುಮತಿಸಲಾಗುತ್ತದೆ.

A uniform margin of 40% has been stipulated for all advances against shares.

The shares of NOFHC can be held by individuals, corporate entities and companies belonging to the Promoter Group. An LLP and trust do not fall under any of these categories. Therefore, an LLP or trust cannot hold voting equity shares directly in the NOFHC but can hold indirectly through a company in the Promoter Group which holds voting equity shares of the NOFHC.

ಉತ್ತರ. ಪಿಪಿಐ ಅನ್ನು ವಾಲೆಟ್ ರೂಪದಲ್ಲಿ ನೀಡಲಾಗಿದ್ದರೆ, ಪಿಪಿಐಗಳಾದ್ಯಂತ ಇಂಟರ್ಆಪರೇಬಿಲಿಟಿಯಯನ್ನು ಯುಪಿಐ ಮೂಲಕ ಸಕ್ರಿಯಗೊಳಿಸಲಾಗುತ್ತದೆ. ಪಿಪಿಐ ಅನ್ನು ಕಾರ್ಡ್ನ ರೂಪದಲ್ಲಿ ನೀಡಿದ್ದರೆ,ಕಾರ್ಡ ಇಂಟರ್ಆಪರೇಬಿಲಿಟಿಗಾಗಿ ಅಧಿಕೃತ ಕಾರ್ಡ್ ನೆಟ್ವರ್ಕ್ಗೆ ಸಂಯೋಜಿತವಾಗಿರುತ್ತದೆ.

Yes, the profit making banks can make donations during a financial year, aggregating upto one per cent of the published profit of the bank for previous year inclusive of donations made earlier under exempted category and donations to National funds and other funds. Banks should not make donations in excess of prescribed ceiling of one per cent as stated above. Unutilised amount of the permissible limit in a year should not be carried forward to the next year for the purpose of making donations.

The shares of NOFHC can be held by individuals, corporate entities and companies belonging to the Promoter Group. An LLP and trust do not fall under any of these categories. Therefore, an LLP or trust cannot hold voting equity shares directly in the NOFHC but can hold indirectly through a company in the Promoter Group which holds voting equity shares of the NOFHC.

ಉತ್ತರ. ಪಿಪಿಐಗಳನ್ನು ಒಳಗೊಂಡ ಅನಧಿಕೃತ/ಮೋಸದ ವಹಿವಾಟುಗಳ ಸಂದರ್ಭದಲ್ಲಿ ಬ್ಯಾಂಕೇತರ ಪಿಪಿಐ ನೀಡಿಕೆದಾರರು ಗ್ರಾಹಕರ ಬಾಧ್ಯತೆಯನ್ನು ನಿರ್ಧರಿಸುವ ಮೊತ್ತ ಹಾಗೂ ಪ್ರಕ್ರಿಯೆಯನ್ನು ಸ್ಪಷ್ಟವಾಗಿ ವಿವರಿಸುತ್ತಾರೆ. ಬ್ಯಾಂಕ್ ಪಿಪಿಐ ನೀಡಿಕೆ ದಾರರಿಗೆ ಕಸ್ಟಮರ್ ಪ್ರೊಟೆಕ್ಷನ್-ಲಿಮಿಟಿಂಗ್ ಲೈಬಿಲಿಟಿ ಆಫ್ ಕಸ್ಟಮರ್ಸ್ ಇನ್ ಅನ್ಆತರೈಸ್ಡ್ ಇಲೆಕ್ಟ್ರಾನಿಕ್ ಬ್ಯಾಂಕಿಂಗ್ ಟ್ರಾನ್ಸಾಕ್ಷನ್ಸ್ ಮೇಲೆ ಜುಲೈ6,2017ರ ದಿನಾಂಕದ ಡಿಪಾರ್ಟ್ಮೆಂಟ್ ಆಪ್ ಬ್ಯಾಂಕಿಂಗ್ ರೆಗ್ಯುಲೇಶನ್ ಸುತ್ತೋಲೆ ಡಿಬಿಆರ್.ನಂ.ಎಲ್ಇಜಿ.ಬಿಸಿ.78/09.07.005/2017-18ರಿಂದ ಮಾರ್ಗದರ್ಶನ ನೀಡಲಾಗುವುದು.

Yes, loss making banks can make donations totaling Rs.5 lakhs only in a financial year.

A. The overall track record of the Promoters/Promoter Group for at least 10 years will be seen. If the Promoters/Promoter Group incorporates a new CIC for the purpose of holding shares in the NOFHC, the track record of the Promoters/Promoter Group setting up the CIC will be seen. [para 2 (B) (b) of the guidelines]

Ans. The framework to limit the liability of customers (PPI holders) against unauthorised transactions in PPIs issued by non-bank issuers is given in paragraph 17 of the MD-PPIs and has come into effect from March 01, 2019. The FAQs given below relate to PPIs issued by non-bank PPI issuers.

Yes, the overseas branches of the banks can make donations abroad, provided the banks do not exceed the prescribed ceiling of one per cent of their published profit of the previous year.

A. Promoter Group for the purpose of these guidelines will be as per the definition given in Annex I to the guidelines.

Ans. Except for the PPIs issued under the arrangement of PPI-MTS as per paragraph 10.2 of MD-PPIs, the framework is applicable to all PPIs issued by authorised non-bank PPI issuers. Even in PPI-MTS, the cases of contributory fraud / negligence / deficiency on the part of the issuer are covered.

i) Boards of Directors of the banks should lay down policy and formulate detailed operational guidelines separately in respect of metropolitan, urban, semi-urban and rural areas covering all areas in respect of acquiring premises on lease/rental basis for the bank's use including delegation of powers at various levels. The decision of surrender or shifting of premises other than at rural centres is taken at central office level by a committee of senior executives. ii) Banks' Boards should lay down a separate policy in respect of loans granted to landlords who provide to them premises on lease/rental basis. The rate of interest to be charged on such loans should be fixed as per the lending rate directives issued by RBI with minimum PLR for the loans above Rs. 2 lakhs. The rate of interest may be simple rate or compound rate as per the usual practice of the bank as applicable to other term loans. iii) Banks should evolve a suitable machinery for dealing with genuine grievances of the landlord for expeditious disposal. iv) In case of negotiated contracts in respect of advances to landlords and rental (including taxes etc. and deposits of Rs.25 lakhs and above) in respect of premises taken on lease/rental basis by public sector banks, the cases will be reported to Central Bureau of Investigation as per the extant Government instructions. This requirement is not applicable to banks in the private sector.

A. Merely holding 10 per cent of the free float in the listed CIC would not make the investor a Promoter. If the investor does not form a part of the Promoters/Promoter Group as per the definition given in Annex I to the guidelines, he would not be considered as a Promoter.

The banks have been given the freedom to determine the service charges to be levied from their customers and the RBI has not prescribed any ceilings in this regard.

Ans. For the purpose of this MD, electronic payment transactions can be–

1. Remote / Online payment transactions: Transactions that do not require physical PPIs to be presented at the point of transactions e.g. wallets, card not present (CNP) transaction, etc.; and

2. Face-to-face / Proximity payment transactions: Transactions that require physical PPIs to be present at the point of transactions e.g. transactions at ATMs, PoS devices, etc.).

A. It is essential that clause (b) of para 2(C)(ii) (i.e. not less than 51 per cent of the voting equity shares of the NOFHC to be held by companies in which the public hold not less than 51 per cent of the voting equity shares) is satisfied in all cases, whereas clause (a) of para 2(C) (ii) does not stipulate any minimum shareholding. Accordingly, it is not necessary that an individual, along with his relatives (as defined in Section 6 of the Companies Act, 1956) and along with entities in which he and/or his relatives hold not less than 50 per cent of the voting equity shares should hold shares in the NOFHC. [para 2 (C) (ii) of the guidelines]

Ans. In order to get protection under this framework, it is mandatory for the customer (PPI holder) to register for SMS alerts.

A. Yes. It would be possible for an individual belonging to the Promoter Group, along with his relatives (as defined in Section 6 of the Companies Act, 1956) and along with entities in which he and/or his relatives hold not less than 50 per cent of voting equity shares, to have significant holdings in other Promoter Group companies in which the public holds not less than 51 per cent of voting equity shares.

Ans. It is mandatory for non-bank PPI issuers to send an SMS alert to the customer for any payment transaction in his / her account. In addition, an e-mail alert may also be sent, wherever registered. The transaction alert should have a contact number and / or e-mail id on which the customer can report unauthorised transactions or notify the objection.

A company in which public holds 51 per cent need not necessarily be listed. For the purpose of these guidelines, ‘public shareholding’ implies that no person along with his relatives (as defined in Section 6 of the Companies Act, 1956) and entities in which he and / or his relatives hold not less than 50 per cent of the voting equity shares, by virtue of his shareholding or otherwise, exercises ‘significant influence’ or ‘control’ (as defined in Accounting Standard 23) over the company.[para 2 (C) (ii) of the guidelines]

Ans. Non-bank PPI issuers shall provide customers with 24x7 access via website / SMS / e-mail / dedicated toll-free helpline for reporting unauthorised transactions and / or loss or theft of the PPI. Further, a direct link for lodging of complaints, with specific option to report unauthorised electronic payment transactions shall be provided by non-bank PPI issuers on the mobile app / home page of their website / any other evolving acceptance mode.

A company in which public holds 51 per cent need not necessarily be listed. For the purpose of these guidelines, ‘public shareholding’ implies that no person along with his relatives (as defined in Section 6 of the Companies Act, 1956) and entities in which he and / or his relatives hold not less than 50 per cent of the voting equity shares, by virtue of his shareholding or otherwise, exercises ‘significant influence’ or ‘control’ (as defined in Accounting Standard 23) over the company.[para 2 (C) (ii) of the guidelines]

Ans. On reporting of an unauthorised payment transaction or loss of instrument, non-bank PPI issuers shall take immediate action to prevent further unauthorised payment transactions in the PPI account of the customer. Any further transactions debit on such an instrument will be the liability of the issuer.

Yes, to the extent permissible under the relevant laws. However, it will not be reckoned for the purpose of calculation of promoter shareholding in the NOFHC.

Ans. The liability of a customer in cases of contributory fraud / negligence / deficiency on the part of the non-bank PPI issuer is zero. PPI-MTS issuers are also covered for such acts / events.

Yes, to the extent permissible under the relevant laws. However, it will not be reckoned for the purpose of calculation of promoter shareholding in the NOFHC.

Ans. It is always advisable to report any unauthorised transaction in the account of the customer. However, an issuer cannot deny compensation against contributory fraud / negligence / deficiency on the part of the non-bank PPI issuer, on the ground that the customer has not reported any unauthorised transaction in his / her account.

A. The percentage holding of the NOFHC/bank will be computed with reference to the date of the investment.

Ans. The ‘per transaction customer liability’ in such cases will depend on the number of days lapsed between the receipt of transaction communication by the customer from the non-bank PPI issuer and the reporting of unauthorised transaction by the customer to the non-bank PPI issuer. If the issuer is reported within three days’ of receiving of communication, the customer liability will be zero. Similarly, for any such transaction reported between four and seven days of receiving of communication, the customer liability will be limited to a maximum of ₹ 10,000/. Reporting beyond seven days’ time will be dealt in accordance with the Board approved policy of the non-bank PPI issuer.

A. As per Para 2 C (vii) of the guidelines, only the regulated financial sector entities in which a Promoter Group has ‘significant influence’ or ‘control’ (as defined in Accounting Standard 23) will be held under the NOFHC. Thus, the NOFHC does not need to wholly own the regulated financial services entities and direct participation in such entities by non-Promoter Group individuals/ companies is permitted. The pattern of shareholding and the capital requirements in the regulated financial services entities held by the NOFHC shall be as prescribed by the respective sectoral regulators. The FDI limits in such entities would be as per extant FDI policy of the Government of India/ Notifications issued under FEMA. As regards the bank, the foreign shareholding would be as per para 2 (F) of the guidelines.

Ans. The number of days mentioned above shall be counted after excluding the date of receiving the communication from the non-bank PPI issuer.

A. The bank as well as the other financial services entities in which the Promoter Group has ‘significant influence’ or ‘control’ (as defined in Accounting Standard 23) and that are regulated by RBI or other financial sector regulators will have to be necessarily held under the NOFHC. If any financial service is not regulated by RBI or any of the other financial sector regulators, any entity in the Promoter Group providing such service, cannot come under the NOFHC. The Promoter Group will not be required to divest its holdings in such entities. [para 2 (C) (iii) of the guidelines]

Ans. In cases where the loss is due to negligence by the customer, such as where he / she has shared the payment credentials, the customer will bear the entire loss until he / she reports the unauthorised transaction to the non-bank PPI issuer.

A. If a Promoter Group entity rendering outsourced services is regulated by any of the financial sector regulators, it would come under the NOFHC. If the said entity is not regulated by any of the financial sector regulators, it cannot come under the NOFHC. The position remains the same irrespective of whether the outsourced services are provided to the regulated financial services entities of the group or to other group entities, including non financial services entities or to non-group entities. [para 2 (C) (vii) of the guidelines]

Ans. Any loss occurring after reporting of the unauthorised transaction shall be borne by the non-bank PPI issuer.

Para 2(C)(iii) of the guidelines provide that only non-financial services companies/entities and non-operative financial holding company in the Group and individuals belonging to Promoter Group will be allowed to hold shares in the NOFHC. Accordingly, a non-operative financial holding company though regulated by RBI will remain outside NOFHC. NBFC (Investment Companies) which hold/deal in equity shares of Promoter Group Companies cannot be under the NOFHC because, in terms of para 2 (I) (IV) (a) of the Guidelines, the financial entities held by NOFHC shall not have any credit and investment (including investments in the equity/debt capital instruments) exposure to the Promoters/Promoter Group entities or individuals associated with the Promoter Group or the NOFHC. Therefore, NBFC (Investment Companies), which would include CICs and other non-operative holding companies, would remain outside NOFHC. However, if there are investments in voting equity shares of regulated financial sector entities in which the Group has significant influence or control, such entities will have to be brought under the NOFHC. ‘Investment Company’ as defined under para 2(I)(vi) of the Non-Banking Financial Companies Acceptance of Public Deposits (Reserve Bank) Direction, 1998, means any company which is a financial institution carrying on, as its principal business, the acquisition of securities.

Ans. The non-bank PPI issuer shall credit (notional reversal / shadow reversal) the amount involved in the unauthorised electronic payment transaction to the customer’s PPI within 10 days from the date of such notification by the customer. Such reversal has to be effected even if it breaches the maximum permissible limit applicable to that type / category of PPI. The credit shall be value-dated to be as of the date of the unauthorised transaction.

Para 2(C)(iii) of the guidelines provide that only non-financial services companies/entities and non-operative financial holding company in the Group and individuals belonging to Promoter Group will be allowed to hold shares in the NOFHC. Accordingly, a non-operative financial holding company though regulated by RBI will remain outside NOFHC. NBFC (Investment Companies) which hold/deal in equity shares of Promoter Group Companies cannot be under the NOFHC because, in terms of para 2 (I) (IV) (a) of the Guidelines, the financial entities held by NOFHC shall not have any credit and investment (including investments in the equity/debt capital instruments) exposure to the Promoters/Promoter Group entities or individuals associated with the Promoter Group or the NOFHC. Therefore, NBFC (Investment Companies), which would include CICs and other non-operative holding companies, would remain outside NOFHC. However, if there are investments in voting equity shares of regulated financial sector entities in which the Group has significant influence or control, such entities will have to be brought under the NOFHC. ‘Investment Company’ as defined under para 2(I)(vi) of the Non-Banking Financial Companies Acceptance of Public Deposits (Reserve Bank) Direction, 1998, means any company which is a financial institution carrying on, as its principal business, the acquisition of securities.

Ans. The notional credit so received can be used on resolution of complaint and establishing the liability of the customer by the non-bank PPI issuer. However, in any circumstances, this period cannot exceed 90 days from the date of receipt of the complaint.