Statement 6: Financing of Gross Fiscal Deficit - As Per cent of Total - 2019-20 (Accounts) - ആർബിഐ - Reserve Bank of India
83724975
പ്രസിദ്ധീകരിച്ചത് നവംബർ 30, 2021
Statement 6: Financing of Gross Fiscal Deficit - As Per cent of Total - 2019-20 (Accounts)
| (Per cent) | ||||||||||||
| State/UT | Market Borrowings | Loans from Centre | Special Securities issued to NSSF | Loans from LIC, NABARD, NCDC, SBI and other Banks | Provident Funds, etc. | Reserve Funds | Deposits and Advances | Suspense and Miscellaneous | Remittances | Others | Overall Surplus (-)/ Deficit (+) | Gross Fiscal Surplus (-)/ Deficit (+) (Col.2 to 12) |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 1. Andhra Pradesh | 84.3 | 1.8 | -3.0 | 1.2 | 2.6 | 3.1 | 22.6 | 2.6 | 1.0 | -0.1 | -16.2 | 100.0 |
| 2. Arunachal Pradesh | 124.8 | -2.5 | 31.1 | 9.9 | 106.6 | 153.9 | -29.9 | -1,034.3 | -529.8 | -0.4 | 1,270.7 | 100.0 |
| 3. Assam | 74.2 | -0.3 | -5.1 | 5.9 | 6.5 | 4.6 | 5.8 | -2.8 | -1.0 | – | 12.1 | 100.0 |
| 4. Bihar | 184.4 | 2.6 | -15.4 | 8.5 | 1.6 | -16.0 | 14.0 | -46.7 | -6.5 | – | -26.4 | 100.0 |
| 5. Chhattisgarh | 61.1 | 0.4 | -2.5 | 1.7 | 4.4 | 4.5 | -2.9 | – | 0.4 | – | 33.0 | 100.0 |
| 6. Goa | 105.9 | -2.8 | -10.8 | -3.4 | 4.1 | 11.1 | 9.8 | -5.7 | 3.2 | -0.3 | -11.2 | 100.0 |
| 7. Gujarat | 116.3 | – | -14.8 | 7.4 | – | 1.5 | 10.0 | -6.8 | 0.4 | – | -14.1 | 100.0 |
| 8. Haryana | 67.8 | -0.5 | -3.3 | 30.3 | 4.1 | 6.3 | -1.6 | – | -0.2 | -0.3 | -2.5 | 100.0 |
| 9. Himachal Pradesh | 79.6 | -0.3 | -10.2 | 5.3 | 21.2 | 42.9 | 3.1 | -25.1 | 1.7 | -0.5 | -17.9 | 100.0 |
| 10. Jharkhand | 70.4 | 3.1 | -9.6 | 2.7 | 0.1 | 50.0 | 15.4 | 1.1 | -0.2 | 6.3 | -39.3 | 100.0 |
| 11. Karnataka | 111.4 | -2.0 | -4.3 | 0.4 | 10.9 | 3.8 | 8.3 | 856.2 | -0.9 | – | -883.8 | 100.0 |
| 12. Kerala | 52.9 | 6.0 | 7.5 | -0.5 | 34.7 | -6.4 | 2.2 | -1.0 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 3.7 | 100.0 |
| 13. Madhya Pradesh | 50.2 | 11.1 | 9.0 | 1.0 | 7.5 | 17.7 | 13.8 | -4.7 | -0.2 | -0.2 | -5.1 | 100.0 |
| 14. Maharashtra | 61.2 | -0.2 | -10.0 | 9.2 | 3.3 | 6.7 | 9.7 | 6.6 | -3.1 | -16.7 | 33.2 | 100.0 |
| 15. Manipur | 177.1 | -5.1 | -7.6 | 1.6 | -2.1 | 44.9 | 3.5 | 0.5 | 0.3 | -2.3 | -110.7 | 100.0 |
| 16. Meghalaya | 97.0 | -0.9 | -4.9 | 6.4 | 18.4 | 17.2 | -50.8 | -0.5 | -0.7 | – | 18.8 | 100.0 |
| 17. Mizoram | 60.9 | -0.6 | -1.4 | 6.2 | -15.8 | 18.0 | 43.8 | 0.7 | 9.9 | -0.3 | -21.4 | 100.0 |
| 18. Nagaland | 29.6 | -1.1 | -0.9 | -1.0 | 39.4 | – | 4.8 | -19.6 | – | -2.8 | 51.7 | 100.0 |
| 19. Odisha | 34.5 | 0.1 | -4.7 | 7.9 | 4.9 | 17.5 | 18.2 | -0.4 | -0.1 | 24.0 | -1.8 | 100.0 |
| 20. Punjab | 109.8 | -1.7 | -10.9 | -6.6 | – | 10.7 | 2.6 | 0.4 | -0.1 | -0.1 | -3.9 | 100.0 |
| 21. Rajasthan | 83.9 | 9.0 | -4.2 | -1.3 | 10.6 | 16.4 | 13.3 | 0.2 | – | -17.9 | -10.0 | 100.0 |
| 22. Sikkim | 23.0 | 0.2 | -0.6 | -2.2 | 7.6 | 19.6 | 3.9 | -5.5 | -5.6 | -0.1 | 59.8 | 100.0 |
| 23. Tamil Nadu | 82.8 | 1.1 | -3.0 | 0.4 | 3.9 | 1.4 | 4.8 | 9.4 | – | – | -0.9 | 100.0 |
| 24. Telangana | 96.7 | -0.7 | -2.6 | 0.9 | 2.5 | 10.2 | 4.4 | 0.9 | – | -0.5 | -11.8 | 100.0 |
| 25. Tripura | 79.0 | -1.0 | -3.6 | -1.8 | 13.3 | 1.7 | 6.4 | 11.3 | -3.7 | – | -1.7 | 100.0 |
| 26. Uttar Pradesh | -503.7 | 4.1 | 46.2 | -10.6 | -29.9 | 616.3 | 18.9 | 16.5 | -2.8 | -5.5 | -49.3 | 100.0 |
| 27. Uttarakhand | 58.8 | 0.3 | -10.2 | -0.5 | 8.7 | 36.0 | 6.6 | -15.2 | – | 0.9 | 14.7 | 100.0 |
| 28. West Bengal | 111.0 | 2.4 | -17.2 | -0.1 | 4.3 | 1.7 | 7.2 | 10.4 | – | -0.4 | -19.5 | 100.0 |
| 29. Jammu and Kashmir | 66.0 | -1.1 | -3.4 | -0.7 | 19.1 | 4.8 | 8.2 | -1.4 | 14.5 | -0.3 | -5.6 | 100.0 |
| 30. NCT Delhi | – | 469.1 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | -369.1 | 100.0 |
| 31. Puducherry | 123.5 | -18.3 | -21.4 | -3.6 | 6.2 | -7.5 | 9.3 | 16.1 | – | -6.4 | 2.1 | 100.0 |
| All States and UTs | 94.8 | 2.1 | -6.1 | 4.0 | 7.6 | -5.2 | 8.2 | 60.3 | -1.2 | -2.0 | -62.6 | 100.0 |
| '–' : Nil/Negligible. Note: (1) Same as in Appendix Table 9. (2) ‘Others’ include Loans from other institutions, compensation bonds appropriation to contingency fund, inter-state settlement and contingency fund. (3) In case of Tripura and Manipur the contribution of respective component needs to be seen in light of surplus GFD; for both these states the positive sign of a component represent positive contribution whereas a negative sign represent a negative contribution in reduction of GFD. Source: Budget documents of the State governments. Details in methodology. |
||||||||||||
प्ले हो रहा है
കേൾക്കുക
ഈ പേജ് ഷെയർ ചെയ്യുക:
റിസർവ് ബാങ്ക് ഓഫ് ഇന്ത്യ മൊബൈൽ ആപ്ലിക്കേഷൻ ഇൻസ്റ്റാൾ ചെയ്ത് ഏറ്റവും പുതിയ വാർത്തകളിലേക്ക് വേഗത്തിലുള്ള ആക്സസ് നേടുക!
ഈ പേജ് സഹായകരമായിരുന്നോ?
