Page
Official Website of Reserve Bank of India
138762154
പ്രസിദ്ധീകരിച്ചത്
ജനുവരി 23, 2026
Statement 6: Financing of Gross Fiscal Deficit – As per cent of Total – 2023-24 (Accounts).
| (Per cent) | ||||||||||||
| State/UTs | Market Borrowings | Loans from Centre | Special Securities issued to NSSF | Loans from LIC, NABARD, NCDC, SBI and other Banks | Provident Funds, etc. | Reserve Funds | Deposits and Advances | Suspense and Miscellaneous | Remittances | Others | Overall Surplus (-)/ Deficit (+) | Gross Fiscal Surplus (-)/ Deficit (+) (Col.2 to 12) |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 1. Andhra Pradesh | 88.2 | 5.8 | -1.9 | 1.3 | 2.4 | 1.3 | 1.1 | -0.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 100.0 |
| 2. Arunachal Pradesh | 42.1 | 147.1 | -11.0 | 23.0 | 41.0 | 65.9 | -8.6 | 2.2 | -6.9 | 0.7 | -195.7 | 100.0 |
| 3. Assam | 76.7 | 28.0 | -3.6 | 11.0 | -1.8 | -2.6 | -3.7 | 10.1 | -0.3 | 0.0 | -13.9 | 100.0 |
| 4. Bihar | 84.5 | 25.6 | -5.3 | 0.2 | -0.7 | 3.4 | 3.4 | 24.8 | 0.0 | -0.7 | -35.4 | 100.0 |
| 5. Chhattisgarh | 97.6 | 13.2 | -1.7 | 2.0 | 5.7 | 2.8 | 1.0 | -0.4 | -0.2 | 0.0 | -20.0 | 100.0 |
| 6. Goa | 73.0 | 29.1 | -9.4 | 15.2 | -0.8 | -17.8 | 9.3 | -9.8 | 34.8 | 21.5 | -45.1 | 100.0 |
| 7. Gujarat | 50.9 | 18.4 | -15.4 | 6.9 | 0.1 | 3.9 | 39.7 | -7.6 | 1.5 | 0.1 | 1.5 | 100.0 |
| 8. Haryana | 106.7 | 4.9 | -3.2 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 4.5 | 7.8 | -1.4 | 0.0 | -17.5 | -3.3 | 100.0 |
| 9. Himachal Pradesh | 54.5 | 13.7 | -5.1 | 1.6 | 14.7 | 3.1 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 1.1 | -2.6 | 18.2 | 100.0 |
| 10. Jharkhand | -30.8 | 75.6 | -12.2 | 9.9 | 8.5 | 49.2 | 62.1 | -1.5 | 0.6 | -13.1 | -48.4 | 100.0 |
| 11. Karnataka | 96.2 | 6.5 | -2.5 | 3.3 | 5.4 | 7.8 | 11.4 | 4.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | -32.3 | 100.0 |
| 12. Kerala | 77.8 | -0.1 | 11.1 | -0.9 | -0.7 | 1.1 | 0.2 | -0.3 | 3.5 | -0.4 | 8.6 | 100.0 |
| 13. Madhya Pradesh | 60.7 | 28.0 | 7.3 | 3.3 | -2.3 | 8.1 | -2.6 | -3.6 | 1.2 | -1.4 | 1.4 | 100.0 |
| 14. Maharashtra | 88.0 | 8.9 | -5.9 | 2.5 | 0.6 | 1.9 | 11.1 | -7.3 | -0.4 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 100.0 |
| 15. Manipur | 57.7 | 29.1 | -2.9 | 3.9 | -2.9 | -1.2 | 3.5 | -2.1 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 13.5 | 100.0 |
| 16. Meghalaya | 29.3 | 42.4 | -1.7 | 2.1 | 2.8 | 2.0 | 6.8 | 0.0 | -0.2 | 5.6 | 10.8 | 100.0 |
| 17. Mizoram | 94.8 | 107.2 | -2.5 | 24.7 | -70.9 | -1.2 | 12.5 | 49.8 | -40.4 | -0.8 | -73.2 | 100.0 |
| 18. Nagaland | 113.0 | 54.4 | -0.7 | 0.5 | -4.3 | 0.0 | -1.6 | -12.2 | 1.4 | -3.3 | -47.3 | 100.0 |
| 19. Odisha | -31.6 | 23.3 | -6.0 | 8.8 | -5.4 | 50.2 | 38.3 | -1.0 | 0.2 | 63.9 | -40.7 | 100.0 |
| 20. Punjab | 95.6 | -1.2 | -5.6 | -3.9 | 1.8 | 4.9 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 7.4 | 100.0 |
| 21. Rajasthan | 86.3 | 14.3 | -2.4 | 1.3 | 9.3 | 1.7 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.0 | -10.6 | -0.9 | 100.0 |
| 22. Sikkim | 67.2 | 31.2 | -0.6 | 0.7 | 0.0 | -2.9 | 2.3 | 4.5 | -4.2 | -0.1 | 2.1 | 100.0 |
| 23. Tamil Nadu | 86.5 | 14.5 | -2.0 | 0.9 | 1.5 | -0.4 | -9.0 | 6.1 | 0.0 | -2.5 | 4.5 | 100.0 |
| 24. Telangana | 80.6 | 3.2 | -1.7 | -0.2 | 3.8 | 1.2 | 7.4 | 1.0 | 0.0 | -2.1 | 6.6 | 100.0 |
| 25. Tripura | -86.3 | 104.3 | -18.7 | 78.5 | 37.7 | 19.5 | -6.6 | 4.8 | -0.1 | 0.0 | -33.2 | 100.0 |
| 26. Uttar Pradesh | 111.1 | 22.3 | -6.3 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 3.8 | 2.8 | 0.0 | -0.9 | -5.7 | -29.7 | 100.0 |
| 27. Uttarakhand | 49.0 | 25.6 | -10.1 | 2.5 | 2.8 | 10.4 | 7.5 | -1.9 | 0.0 | -1.7 | 15.9 | 100.0 |
| 28. West Bengal | 90.6 | 11.5 | -11.7 | -0.2 | 2.3 | 5.4 | 10.5 | -1.7 | 0.0 | 2.0 | -8.7 | 100.0 |
| 29. Jammu and Kashmir | 164.9 | -1.4 | -9.9 | 4.6 | 13.3 | 5.9 | 5.2 | -0.4 | -0.1 | -79.1 | -3.1 | 100.0 |
| 30. NCT Delhi | – | -126.9 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 226.9 | 100.0 |
| 31. Puducherry | 102.6 | -44.8 | – | 13.2 | 16.0 | 0.0 | 12.4 | 12.7 | -33.3 | -3.5 | 24.8 | 100.0 |
| All States and UTs | 84.5 | 13.1 | -3.5 | 1.9 | 2.4 | 4.3 | 5.1 | 0.9 | 0.1 | -2.0 | -6.7 | 100.0 |
| ‘-’ : Nil/Negligible. Notes : 1. Same as in Appendix Table 9. 2. ‘Others’ include Loans from other institutions, compensation bonds appropriation to contingency fund, inter-state settlement and contingency fund. 3 In case of Tripura and Manipur the contribution of respective component needs to be seen in light of surplus GFD; for both these states the positive sign of a component represent positive contribution whereas a negative sign represent a negative contribution in reduction of GFD. Source : Budget documents of the State governments. Details in methodology. |
||||||||||||
प्ले हो रहा है
കേൾക്കുക
പേജ് അവസാനം അപ്ഡേറ്റ് ചെയ്തത്:
ഈ പേജ് സഹായകരമായിരുന്നോ?