Yes, deposit may be made in combination of more than one means of payment, at a single time. However, the effective date of deposit would be the date of realization of the total amount of deposit at the bank’s end

The compensation amount, if any, which can be awarded by the NBFC Ombudsman, for any loss suffered by the complainant, is limited to the amount arising directly out of the act or omission of the NBFC or rupees one million, whichever is lower.

Ans. Yes

Ans. Yes. It shall be in order for such non-bank PSPs to effect funds transfer from their current account with RBI to current accounts maintained with commercial banks for taking care of their routine payments. The current account of RBI shall not be used therefor.

Further, extant instructions for non-bank PPI issuers on maintenance of escrow account/s with scheduled commercial bank(s) shall continue to apply. Card networks shall not be allowed to use the RBI current account for their settlement guarantee and related activities.

The compensation amount, if any, which can be awarded by the Ombudsman, for any loss suffered by the complainant, is limited to the amount arising directly out of the act or omission or commission of the System Participant, or two million rupees whichever is lower. The compensation shall be over and above the disputed amount.

Ans. The purpose of having a dedicated redress mechanism for recovery related grievances is that these grievances should be promptly addressed. Treating (clubbing) them as (with) other complaints (e.g., operational issues) may result in delayed action. However, this does not imply that a separate redress mechanism for recovery related grievances is being mandated. REs can restructure/ re-organise the existing customer grievance redress mechanism to identify and promptly address recovery related grievances.

Restructuring in respect of projects under implementation involving deferment of DCCO are excluded from the scope of the Resolution Framework. The extant regulations contained in Paragraph 4.2.15 of DBR.No.BP.BC.2/21.04.048/2015-16 dated July 1, 2015, DOR.No.BP.BC.33/21.04.048/2019-20 dated February 7, 2020 and the other relevant instructions as applicable to specific category of lending institutions, already permit revisions of the DCCO and consequential shift in repayment schedule without being treated as restructuring subject to a maximum of four years in the case of infrastructure projects and a maximum of two years in the case of non-infrastructure projects (including commercial real estate exposures). In addition to the above, DCCO of projects may be extended by a further two years in case of change in ownership subject to the conditions specified in the above instructions.

Further information is available on our website (www.rbi.org.in) and the website of the Government of India (www.finmin.nic.in)

Also see:

All You wanted to know from RBI about: Withdrawal of Legal Tender Status of ₹ 500 and ₹ 1000 Notes

Response: Interest or any charges/fees on the credit card shall not be factored in for the purpose of computing a cardholder’s credit limit usage and levying overlimit charges.

A CSGL account holder shall be deemed to be the holder of the securities held in the respective account with RBI, however, the constituents i.e. GAHs, as the beneficial owners of the Government security held therein, shall be entitled to claim from the CSGL account holder all the benefits and be subjected to all the liabilities in respect of the Government securities held in the CSGL account.