Appendix Table 12: Composition of Outstanding Liabilities of State Governments - As Proportion to Total - ଆରବିଆଇ - Reserve Bank of India
83709395
ପ୍ରକାଶିତ ତାରିଖ ସେପ୍ଟେମ୍ବର 30, 2019
Appendix Table 12: Composition of Outstanding Liabilities of State Governments - As Proportion to Total
(As at end-March) | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Per cent) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Year | Market Loans | Power Bonds | UDAY | Compen- sation and Other Bonds | NSSF | WMA from RBI | Loans from LIC | Loans from GIC | Loans from NABARD | Loans from SBI and Other banks | Loans from NCDC | Loans from Other Institu- tions | Loans from Banks and FIs | Total Internal Debt | Loans and Advan ces from Centre | Provi dent Funds, etc. | Reserve Fund | Deposit and Advan ces (Net Balan ces) | Conti- gency Fund | Total Outstand- ing Liabi lities |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 = sum (8 to 13) | 15 = sum (2 to 7)+14 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 = sum (15 to 20) |
2002 | 15.1 | - | - | - | 13.1 | 1.4 | 0.7 | - | 1.3 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 2.6 | 5.9 | 35.4 | 36.1 | 15.0 | 4.0 | 9.3 | 0.2 | 100.0 |
2003 | 16.9 | - | - | - | 17.7 | 0.3 | 0.8 | - | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 3.0 | 6.5 | 41.5 | 31.7 | 14.5 | 4.1 | 8.3 | - | 100.0 |
2004 | 19.9 | 3.2 | - | - | 22.0 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 3.7 | 7.3 | 52.8 | 21.4 | 13.5 | 4.7 | 7.7 | - | 100.0 |
2005 | 21.1 | 2.9 | - | - | 27.8 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 3.5 | 6.7 | 58.7 | 15.8 | 12.9 | 5.2 | 7.4 | 0.1 | 100.0 |
2006 | 19.9 | 2.8 | - | - | 31.9 | - | 1.1 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 3.1 | 6.3 | 60.9 | 13.7 | 12.3 | 5.5 | 7.6 | 0.1 | 100.0 |
2007 | 19.6 | 2.1 | - | - | 34.3 | - | 1.0 | 0.1 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 2.4 | 5.6 | 61.5 | 11.8 | 12.1 | 6.3 | 8.1 | 0.1 | 100.0 |
2008 | 22.5 | 1.7 | - | - | 32.4 | - | 0.9 | 0.1 | 1.6 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 2.1 | 5.4 | 62.1 | 10.9 | 12.2 | 5.9 | 8.8 | 0.2 | 100.0 |
2009 | 27.3 | 1.5 | - | - | 29.4 | - | 0.7 | 0.1 | 1.9 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 1.9 | 5.3 | 63.5 | 9.8 | 12.1 | 5.7 | 8.7 | 0.2 | 100.0 |
2010 | 31.3 | 1.1 | - | - | 27.6 | - | 0.6 | 0.1 | 2.1 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 1.6 | 5.1 | 65.1 | 8.7 | 12.2 | 5.7 | 8.2 | 0.1 | 100.0 |
2011 | 33.0 | 0.8 | - | - | 27.0 | 0.1 | 0.5 | - | 2.2 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 1.3 | 4.5 | 65.4 | 7.9 | 12.5 | 5.6 | 8.4 | 0.2 | 100.0 |
2012 | 37.2 | 0.6 | - | - | 24.4 | - | 0.4 | - | 2.4 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 4.2 | 66.3 | 7.2 | 12.7 | 4.6 | 9.0 | 0.2 | 100.0 |
2013 | 39.6 | 0.4 | - | - | 22.0 | - | 0.4 | - | 2.5 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 3.9 | 65.9 | 6.6 | 12.6 | 6.0 | 8.8 | 0.2 | 100.0 |
2014 | 42.5 | 0.3 | - | - | 19.8 | 0.1 | 0.3 | - | 2.4 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 3.6 | 66.2 | 5.9 | 12.4 | 6.0 | 9.3 | 0.1 | 100.0 |
2015 | 46.9 | 0.1 | - | - | 19.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | - | 2.3 | - | 0.1 | 0.9 | 3.5 | 69.7 | 5.4 | 11.8 | 3.7 | 9.1 | 0.2 | 100.0 |
2016 | 47.1 | - | 3.1 | 0.6 | 16.8 | - | 0.2 | - | 2.7 | - | 0.1 | 1.4 | 4.4 | 72.0 | 4.6 | 10.9 | 4.3 | 8.1 | 0.1 | 100.0 |
2017 | 48.8 | - | 5.5 | 0.5 | 13.3 | - | 0.1 | - | 2.6 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 1.6 | 5.2 | 73.3 | 4.0 | 10.7 | 3.2 | 8.7 | 0.1 | 100.0 |
2018 | 51.4 | - | 4.8 | 0.5 | 11.1 | - | 0.1 | - | 2.7 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 1.4 | 4.9 | 72.7 | 3.8 | 10.3 | 4.1 | 9.1 | 0.1 | 100.0 |
2019 RE | 54.3 | - | 4.2 | 0.4 | 9.4 | - | 0.1 | - | 3.0 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 1.3 | 5.0 | 73.3 | 3.7 | 10.1 | 4.1 | 8.6 | 0.1 | 100.0 |
2020 BE | 57.9 | - | 3.8 | 0.4 | 7.7 | 0.1 | 0.1 | - | 3.2 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 1.1 | 4.9 | 74.8 | 3.7 | 9.7 | 4.0 | 7.8 | 0.1 | 100.0 |
RE : Revised Estimates. BE : Budget Estimates. '–' : Not applicable/Not available/negligible. Note: 1. From 1997 to 2003, ‘Loans from Other Institutions’ also includes ‘Other Loans’ and ‘Loans from GIC’. From 2004, ‘Loans from Other Institutions’ includes ‘Other Loans’. 2. As detailed break-up of Discharge of Internal Debt for Arunachal Pradesh was not available, the same has been included under ‘Loans from Other Institutions’. 3. Also see ‘Explanatory Note on Data Sources and Methodology’. 4. Data from 2017-18 onwards include Delhi and Puducherry also. Source: Budget documents of the state governments. Details in methodology. |
प्ले हो रहा है
ଶୁଣନ୍ତୁ
ଏହି ପେଜ୍ ସହାୟକ ଥିଲା କି?