Statement 5: Financing of Gross Fiscal Deficit - 2012-13 (Accounts) - ଆରବିଆଇ - Reserve Bank of India
83677034
ପ୍ରକାଶିତ ତାରିଖ ମଇ 12, 2015
Statement 5: Financing of Gross Fiscal Deficit - 2012-13 (Accounts)
(Amount in ₹ billion) | ||||||||||||
State | Market Borrowings |
Loans from Centre |
Special Securities issued to NSSF |
Loans from LIC, NABARD, NCDC, SBI and other Banks |
Provident Funds, etc. |
Reserve Funds |
Deposits and Advances |
Suspense and Miscellaneous |
Remittances | Others | Overall Surplus (–)/ Deficit (+) |
Gross Fiscal Surplus (–)/ Deficit (+) (Col.2 to 12) |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
I. Non-Special Category | ||||||||||||
1. Andhra Pradesh | 166.0 | 0.4 | -4.9 | 3.2 | 11.9 | 0.8 | 16.7 | -2.7 | -6.8 | -8.3 | -1.1 | 175.1 |
2. Bihar | 57.6 | 0.2 | 2.9 | 6.0 | -2.2 | 2.8 | 22.0 | -3.0 | 0.2 | -2.1 | -19.1 | 65.5 |
3. Chhattisgarh | 10.4 | -1.5 | 0.2 | 1.7 | 2.9 | 3.3 | 5.2 | -1.3 | -2.6 | -0.5 | 8.9 | 26.6 |
4. Goa | 9.9 | 1.4 | -0.2 | 0.8 | 1.5 | 1.1 | 1.9 | -7.0 | -1.8 | 0.1 | 3.7 | 11.5 |
5. Gujarat | 128.5 | -1.5 | -5.6 | -0.2 | 5.9 | 4.9 | 18.4 | 6.5 | -0.7 | 9.3 | -0.6 | 164.9 |
6. Haryana | 85.7 | -0.8 | -0.9 | 11.3 | 4.6 | -0.4 | 6.0 | 0.9 | -0.7 | -2.7 | 0.6 | 103.6 |
7. Jharkhand | 31.5 | 1.0 | -9.4 | 5.1 | 0.2 | -1.2 | 12.9 | 0.4 | -1.4 | -2.7 | -2.3 | 34.0 |
8. Karnataka | 91.5 | 6.5 | -5.2 | 4.6 | 17.3 | -2.4 | 25.1 | 1.0 | -0.3 | – | 7.0 | 145.1 |
9. Kerala | 105.7 | 2.3 | 0.3 | -2.2 | 36.9 | 0.6 | 11.4 | 7.1 | 0.3 | -1.4 | -11.1 | 150.0 |
10. Madhya Pradesh | 33.6 | 9.1 | 7.2 | 6.7 | 8.4 | 20.2 | 3.5 | -2.2 | 4.0 | -4.6 | 8.3 | 94.2 |
11. Maharashtra | 163.2 | 0.6 | -9.4 | -1.1 | 21.9 | 0.4 | 64.4 | 1.0 | 8.4 | -2.8 | -109.3 | 137.4 |
12. Odisha | -13.1 | -0.7 | 1.1 | 6.2 | 6.9 | -1.1 | 15.9 | – | – | -6.4 | -9.0 | – |
13. Punjab | 85.6 | -0.5 | -5.0 | -9.1 | 15.7 | 6.3 | -0.7 | 0.2 | -0.1 | -1.0 | 2.0 | 93.5 |
14. Rajasthan | 56.6 | -2.7 | -7.5 | 6.4 | 21.6 | 4.2 | 34.2 | – | 0.3 | -0.3 | -27.4 | 85.3 |
15. Tamil Nadu | 156.7 | 8.3 | -6.6 | 4.4 | 13.3 | 8.1 | 19.4 | 6.6 | -0.1 | -0.7 | -44.2 | 165.2 |
16. Telangana | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
17. Uttar Pradesh | 62.6 | -11.0 | 24.3 | -1.0 | 33.4 | 43.9 | 17.5 | 35.4 | 9.9 | -5.7 | -17.0 | 192.4 |
18. West Bengal | 179.9 | 8.6 | -0.5 | -0.1 | 9.5 | 0.4 | 29.4 | -5.7 | 2.3 | -6.4 | -25.9 | 191.5 |
II. Special Category | ||||||||||||
1. Arunachal Pradesh | 1.7 | -0.3 | 1.6 | 0.6 | 1.3 | – | 0.7 | -0.1 | 1.2 | -1.3 | -3.1 | 2.3 |
2. Assam | -7.0 | -0.9 | 6.4 | – | 8.1 | -1.2 | 4.1 | -1.6 | -0.4 | – | 7.5 | 15.2 |
3. Himachal Pradesh | 16.6 | 0.7 | 2.9 | 1.6 | 11.1 | 0.1 | -1.6 | 0.7 | -1.7 | -9.2 | 8.6 | 29.8 |
4. Jammu and Kashmir | 15.5 | -0.6 | 0.9 | 3.6 | 16.9 | 1.7 | 1.9 | -0.2 | -6.1 | – | 8.6 | 42.2 |
5. Manipur | 1.8 | -0.4 | -0.2 | 0.4 | 1.4 | 0.1 | -0.4 | -0.1 | – | – | -2.6 | – |
6. Meghalaya | 3.0 | -0.2 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 1.1 | -0.1 | -5.8 | 1.1 | 0.2 | -0.1 | 3.9 | 4.0 |
7. Mizoram | 0.7 | -0.2 | 0.2 | – | 2.0 | 0.1 | 2.3 | -0.5 | -0.2 | -0.1 | 1.5 | 5.8 |
8. Nagaland | 4.7 | -0.2 | – | – | 0.7 | – | 2.1 | -0.3 | -0.8 | -0.1 | 0.6 | 6.5 |
9. Sikkim | 0.7 | -0.1 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 0.5 | -0.1 | 0.4 | 0.4 | -0.6 | – | -1.2 | 0.7 |
10. Tripura | 5.3 | -0.3 | -0.1 | 0.5 | 2.4 | – | -0.3 | – | 0.1 | -0.1 | -10.8 | -3.4 |
11. Uttarakhand | 7.4 | 0.1 | 5.1 | 2.7 | 2.7 | -0.9 | 2.8 | 4.8 | -1.0 | – | -7.6 | 16.0 |
All States | 1,462.5 | 17.3 | -1.7 | 52.8 | 257.8 | 91.5 | 309.6 | 41.4 | 1.5 | -47.1 | -230.8 | 1,954.7 |
Memo item: | ||||||||||||
1. NCT Delhi | – | – | -3.7 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 26.5 | 22.8 |
2. Puducherry | – | -0.1 | -0.6 | – | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.7 | -1.3 | 0.2 | 4.1 | -1.1 | 2.2 |
'–': Nil/Negligible. Note: 1. Same as in Appendix Table 9. 2. The detailed break-up of ‘Discharge of Internal Debt’ was not available for Arunachal Pradesh and the same has been included under ‘Others’. The financing items under ‘Internal Debt’ for these States are, therefore, not on a net basis except ‘Others’. 3. ‘Others’ include Loans from other institutions, compensation bonds, appropriation to contingency fund, inter-state settlement and contingency fund. Source: Budget documents of state governments, CAG for 2012-13 in respect of Jammu & Kashmir. |
प्ले हो रहा है
ଶୁଣନ୍ତୁ
ଏହି ପେଜ୍ ସହାୟକ ଥିଲା କି?