Statement 6: Financing of Gross Fiscal Deficit – As per cent of Total – 2022-23 (Accounts) - ربی - Reserve Bank of India
131101426
شائع کیا گیا پر
دسمبر 19, 2024
Statement 6: Financing of Gross Fiscal Deficit – As per cent of Total – 2022-23 (Accounts)
(Per cent) | ||||||||||||
State/UTs | Market Borrowings | Loans from Centre | Special Securities issued to NSSF | Loans from LIC, NABARD, NCDC, SBI and other Banks | Provident Funds, etc. | Reserve Funds | Deposits and Advances | Suspense and Miscellaneous | Remittances | Others | Overall Surplus (-)/ Deficit (+) | Gross Fiscal Surplus (-)/ Deficit (+) (Col.2 to 12) |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
1. Andhra Pradesh | 87.3 | 13.0 | -2.2 | 1.8 | 2.5 | 3.5 | -7.8 | 0.5 | – | – | 1.6 | 100.0 |
2. Arunachal Pradesh | 22.4 | 88.5 | -11.1 | 10.7 | 22.7 | -15.4 | 0.5 | 0.9 | -35.7 | 0.4 | 16.1 | 100.0 |
3. Assam | 56.7 | 15.1 | -2.7 | 4.6 | 0.4 | 2.5 | 3.6 | 0.8 | -0.2 | – | 19.3 | 100.0 |
4. Bihar | 61.8 | 19.4 | -4.2 | -0.7 | -0.3 | 3.5 | 0.9 | 2.6 | 0.0 | -0.5 | 17.5 | 100.0 |
5. Chhattisgarh | -46.9 | 74.0 | -9.7 | 6.6 | 27.9 | -3.9 | 7.7 | 2.0 | 0.8 | -1.9 | 43.4 | 100.0 |
6. Goa | 47.9 | 47.4 | -16.0 | 35.2 | -6.2 | -25.7 | 49.6 | -3.8 | 402.6 | 14.6 | -445.5 | 100.0 |
7. Gujarat | 168.0 | 27.9 | -21.5 | 4.8 | -1.1 | 7.0 | 2.4 | -15.9 | 0.1 | -0.1 | -71.5 | 100.0 |
8. Haryana | 109.0 | 3.4 | -3.2 | -3.6 | 0.9 | 2.9 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 0.1 | -16.5 | 5.3 | 100.0 |
9. Himachal Pradesh | 98.8 | 5.1 | -4.6 | 2.0 | 5.5 | -0.3 | 1.5 | 4.2 | -1.3 | -2.5 | -8.3 | 100.0 |
10. Jharkhand | 8.7 | 73.0 | -16.7 | 3.2 | 0.3 | -17.5 | 72.5 | 6.4 | -0.8 | -16.0 | -13.2 | 100.0 |
11. Karnataka | 55.8 | 8.1 | -3.5 | 1.0 | 7.3 | 9.2 | 56.2 | 2.6 | 0.3 | – | -36.9 | 100.0 |
12. Kerala | 61.1 | 6.6 | 4.0 | -0.6 | 33.4 | -0.4 | 4.6 | -0.4 | 1.4 | -0.6 | -9.2 | 100.0 |
13. Madhya Pradesh | 66.9 | 20.5 | 3.3 | 3.5 | -3.1 | 6.4 | 6.1 | 3.5 | 2.2 | -4.8 | -4.6 | 100.0 |
14. Maharashtra | 63.3 | 13.6 | -8.0 | 4.4 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 5.5 | 15.6 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 3.1 | 100.0 |
15. Manipur | 65.3 | 30.1 | -3.1 | 7.3 | 0.0 | 5.3 | -4.8 | 0.7 | -7.1 | -1.0 | 7.2 | 100.0 |
16. Meghalaya | 48.9 | 38.7 | -2.0 | 3.2 | 4.5 | -0.2 | 13.2 | -0.2 | 0.1 | -0.4 | -5.8 | 100.0 |
17. Mizoram | 102.0 | 25.0 | -1.5 | 2.5 | -22.7 | -1.8 | -67.1 | 46.3 | 17.1 | -0.1 | 0.3 | 100.0 |
18. Nagaland | 76.7 | 31.7 | -0.8 | -0.7 | -9.2 | 0.0 | -1.6 | 5.5 | 3.0 | -3.7 | -0.8 | 100.0 |
19. Odisha | -49.3 | -0.9 | -5.8 | 8.3 | -3.3 | -12.6 | 18.4 | 1.1 | 0.1 | -8.7 | 152.6 | 100.0 |
20. Punjab | 105.5 | 1.2 | -5.4 | -3.1 | 0.6 | 2.8 | 0.4 | 1.1 | 0.1 | -6.3 | 3.2 | 100.0 |
21. Rajasthan | 72.5 | 11.1 | -3.1 | 1.4 | 10.5 | 2.2 | 2.8 | -0.1 | 0.0 | -13.7 | 16.4 | 100.0 |
22. Sikkim | 69.4 | 28.5 | -0.8 | 1.4 | 1.9 | -3.1 | -0.7 | -7.7 | 4.3 | -0.1 | 7.0 | 100.0 |
23. Tamil Nadu | 83.0 | 10.4 | -2.2 | 1.9 | 2.3 | 1.3 | 5.0 | -0.1 | 0.0 | -2.8 | 1.3 | 100.0 |
24. Telangana | 97.7 | 6.1 | -2.5 | 0.3 | 6.3 | -0.6 | 2.9 | 1.1 | -1.4 | -3.1 | -6.8 | 100.0 |
25. Tripura | -42.6 | 21.5 | -7.9 | 21.5 | 7.3 | 1.3 | -4.0 | -0.4 | – | – | 103.4 | 100.0 |
26. Uttar Pradesh | 71.3 | 11.0 | -7.9 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 1.8 | 5.6 | 0.1 | 1.6 | -6.8 | 21.9 | 100.0 |
27. Uttarakhand | 49.2 | 39.2 | -48.9 | -7.1 | 4.2 | 2.1 | 11.7 | -9.2 | 0.6 | 3.1 | 55.2 | 100.0 |
28. West Bengal | 85.4 | 7.1 | -12.7 | -0.2 | 2.4 | 2.1 | 12.0 | -2.4 | 1.0 | 1.8 | 3.5 | 100.0 |
29. Jammu and Kashmir | 130.2 | -2.5 | -17.5 | 3.1 | -11.8 | 7.7 | 14.6 | 5.9 | 0.2 | -7.8 | -22.2 | 100.0 |
30. NCT Delhi | – | 32.1 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 67.9 | 100.0 |
31. Puducherry | -200.1 | 61.9 | – | -2.6 | -14.0 | – | -10.8 | -6.6 | – | 198.4 | 73.8 | 100.0 |
All States and UTs | 75.2 | 12.2 | -5.0 | 1.5 | 3.5 | 2.1 | 7.7 | 1.8 | 0.9 | -3.7 | 3.7 | 100.0 |
‘-’ : Nil/Negligible. Notes : 1. Same as in Appendix Table 9. 2. ‘Others’ include Loans from other institutions, compensation bonds appropriation to contingency fund, inter-state settlement and contingency fund. 3 In case of Tripura and Manipur the contribution of respective component needs to be seen in light of surplus GFD; for both these states the positive sign of a component represent positive contribution whereas a negative sign represent a negative contribution in reduction of GFD. Source : Budget documents of the State governments. Details in methodology. |
PLAYING
LISTEN
یہ صفحہ مددگار تھا؟