RbiSearchHeader

Press escape key to go back

Past Searches

Theme
Theme
Text Size
Text Size
S2

RbiAnnouncementWeb

RBI Announcements
RBI Announcements

Asset Publisher

83145401

Quarterly Industrial Outlook Survey: October-December 2010 (52nd Round)

Quarterly Industrial Outlook Survey: October-December 2010 (52nd Round)*

This article presents the survey findings of Industrial Outlook Survey conducted for October- December 2010 quarter, the 52nd round in the series. It gives the assessment of business situation by companies in manufacturing sector, for the quarter October-December 2010, and their expectations for the ensuing quarter January-March 2011. The survey results signalled further improvement of business conditions in the Indian manufacturing sector for assessment quarter (October-December 2010). The Business Expectation Index – a measure that gives a single snapshot of the industrial outlook in each study quarter–registered an increase to 122.8 from 119.0 for the assessment quarter. However, the manufacturers expect the growth to moderate in January-March 2011. The expectation index is seen to decline marginally from 126.5 to 125.9 for January-March 2011 quarter but remains much above 100 which is the threshold that separates contraction from expansion.

Highlights

The survey conducted in October-December 2010 shows that the business condition in India’s manufacturing sector has improved further. However, the expectation for the January-March 2011 quarter shows no further improvement.

  • The demand conditions show signs of escalation during the assessment quarter. Production in the Indian manufacturing sector rose for the assessment quarter of the latest survey round, mirroring a similar increase in new orders and capacity utilisation. Demand was generated in the external market also, as exports have increased further. However, the manufacturing sector anticipates the progress of demand conditions to moderate in the next quarter. About one-fourth of the respondents reported addition to their labour force.

  • The financial conditions which slightly tightened in the previous quarter has reversed during the current quarter as the optimism level for overall financial situation improved during the assessment quarter, and the same is to improve further for the expectation quarter. The manufacturers reported marginal improvement in the availability of finance for the assessment as well as expectation quarters but at higher costs. Input prices are assessed to increase but the manufacturers are able to pass it on to the customers, at least partly, as it is reflected in the increase in selling prices for both the quarters under review.

  • The survey findings exhibit that the Indian manufacturing continued to gain strength as Business Expectation Index (BEI), for the assessment quarter (October-December 2010) increased to 122.8 from 119.0. However, the sentiment is expected to moderate for the January-March 2011 quarter with BEI moderating to 125.9 from 126.5 in the the previous quarter.

  • The industry-wise break-up shows that majority of the industry groups have positive overall business sentiments in the present quarter. Specifically, a few industry groups, viz., Transport equipment, Wood & Wood Products, Other (Non- Electrical) Machinery & Apparatus and Basic Chemicals are more optimistic than the others. Fertilisers, Cement and Textiles expect low business performance in Q4 FY10.

  • Size-wise analysis shows that improvement is seen across all size groups, but the bigger companies are more optimistic. They expect improved order book, and return of pricing power. Though the smaller companies (annual production less than `100 crore) have improved their performance, their growth is at a lower rate as compared to the bigger companies.

I. Introduction

The Reserve Bank of India has been conducting the Industrial Outlook Survey (IOS) on a quarterly basis since 1998. The Survey gives insight into the perception of the public and private limited companies engaged in manufacturing activities about their own performance and prospects. The survey covers private and public limited companies with a good size/industry representation. The assessment of business sentiments for the current quarter and expectations for the ensuing quarter are based on qualitative responses on 20 major parameters covering overall business situation, financial situation, demand indicators, price, profit margins and employment situation. The survey provides useful forward-looking inputs for policymakers, analysts and business alike.

II. Data Coverage and Methodology1

II. 1. Sample Size

The sample covers a panel of 3,000 public and private limited companies, mostly with paid-up capital above `50 lakh, in the manufacturing sector. The fieldwork for the survey was carried out by an agency during the two-month period ending November 2010. The panel of respondents is kept uniform to the extent possible with periodic updation in the case of addition of new companies or deletion of closed/merged companies. The sample is chosen, so as to get a good representation of size and industry.

II. 2. Response to the Survey

The survey elicited response from 1,588 companies (57 per cent of the sample) within the stipulated time. Companies with incomplete or improperly filled-in schedules were excluded for the analysis. The study is based on responses of 1,561 companies which were included in the analysis.

II. 3. The Survey Schedule

The survey schedule consists of qualitative questions and the target respondents are senior management personnel or finance heads of the companies. The schedule canvassed on quarterly basis runs into two pages containing five blocks. (Annex)

III. Survey Findings

The survey results are being published in a concise form in the Reserve Bank’s quarterly publication ‘Macroeconomic and Monetary Developments’ since 2005. The survey findings of the 52nd round conducted for October-December 2010 quarter are presented in this article.

III. 1. Demand conditions

Survey collects perceptions of the Indian manufacturers about prominent demand-related parameters, namely, Production, Order Books, Capacity Utilisation, Inventory, Exports and Imports.

III. 1.1. Production

The survey seeks the company’s assessment for October-December 2010 and expectations for January- March 2011 on change in overall production (for all products put together). The net response on higher production registered an increase to 43.9 from 40.0 for the assessment quarter. However, for the expectation quarter, the net response has moderated marginally to 48.6 from 49.1 as compared to the previous survey round (Table 1 and Chart 1).

III. 1. 2. Order Books

The demand position of the manufacturing companies, as measured by order books, has also shown a similar trend. The net response, for the assessment quarter has recorded further increase while the same has moderated slightly for the expectation quarter (Table 2 and Chart 2).

Table 1: Assessment & Expectations for Production

(Percentage responses)#

Survey Quarter

Total response

Assessment for Current Quarter

Expectation for Next Quarter

Increase

Decrease

No change

Net response

Increase

Decrease

No change

Net response

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Jan-Mar 09

1225

27.1

35.1

37.7

-8.0

41.8

15.8

42.3

26.0

Apr-Jun 09

1242

33.1

26.2

40.6

6.9

32.5

22.6

44.9

9.9

Jul-Sep 09

1180

40.9

18.3

40.8

22.6

38.5

16.1

45.5

22.4

Oct-Dec 09

1256

44.0

15.2

40.8

28.9

46.0

11.0

43.0

35.0

Jan-Mar 10

1079

49.0

12.5

38.5

36.5

48.8

8.8

42.3

40.0

Apr-Jun 10

1092

48.4

13.0

38.6

35.4

45.8

9.9

44.3

35.9

Jul-Sep 10

1403

51.6

11.6

36.8

40.0

49.7

9.4

40.9

40.2

Oct-Dec 10

1561

53.9

10.0

36.0

43.9

55.9

6.8

37.3

49.1

Jan-Mar 11

         

55.4

6.8

37.7

48.6

# Due to rounding off percentage may not add up to 100.


1

III. 1.3. Pending Orders

More than 80 per cent respondent companies reported no change in the pending order position, both for the assessment quarter as well as the ensuing quarter (Table 3 and Chart 3).

III. 1.4. Capacity Utilisation

The survey collects views of manufacturing companies on Capacity Utilisation of the main product (increase/decrease/no change), Level of capacity utilisation compared to the average in the last four quarters (above normal/below normal/normal) and Assessment of production capacity with regard to expected demand in the next six months (more than adequate/less than adequate/adequate).

Table 2: Assessment & Expectations for Order books

(Percentage responses)#

Survey Quarter

Total response

Assessment for Current Quarter

Expectation for Next Quarter

Increase

Decrease

No change

Net response

Increase

Decrease

No change

Net response

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Jan-Mar 09

1225

22.9

39.7

37.4

-16.8

37.3

16.7

46.1

20.6

Apr-Jun 09

1242

28.4

29.3

42.3

-0.9

31.0

24.6

44.4

6.4

Jul-Sep 09

1180

38.2

17.7

44.1

20.5

35.5

18.7

45.8

16.8

Oct-Dec 09

1256

39.5

13.6

46.8

25.9

43.5

11.2

45.3

32.3

Jan-Mar 10

1079

43.5

11.6

44.9

31.9

44.8

9.1

46.1

35.8

Apr-Jun 10

1092

41.8

10.5

47.7

31.3

42.3

8.9

48.8

33.4

Jul-Sep 10

1403

45.4

9.3

45.3

36.1

44.4

8.1

47.5

36.3

Oct-Dec 10

1561

46.9

9.1

44.0

37.9

49.8

5.1

45.1

44.8

Jan-Mar 11

         

49.6

5.6

44.8

44.0

# Due to rounding off percentage may not add up to 100.


2

While about 54 per cent of the respondent companies reported no change in the capacity utilisation of their main product, about 37 per cent of the companies reported an increase over the previous quarter. On net response basis, there is marginal improvement in Capacity Utilisation of the main product over previous quarter but the improvement is significant as compared to the position a year ago. The overall level of capacity utilisation is assessed to be normal with respect to average capacity in the last four quarters. The expectation for the next quarter also exhibited the similar sentiment. Assessment of Production capacity with regard to expected demand in next six months also shows that there will be adequate capacity in the current as well as in the next quarter (Table 4 and Chart 4).

3

III. 1.5. Inventory of Raw Materials & Finished Goods

Majority of the respondents (81-85 per cent) reported maintaining the average level of Inventory of raw materials and Inventory of finished goods for the assessment as well as expectation quarter (Table 5). Around 10-12 per cent of the respondents assessed their inventory levels to be above average during the current quarter. The proportion is expected to decline marginally in the next quarter.

Table 3: Assessment & Expectations for Pending Orders

(Percentage responses)#

Survey Quarter

Total response

Assessment for Current Quarter

Expectation for Next Quarter

Below Normal

Above Normal

Normal

Net response

Below Normal

Above Normal

Normal

Net response

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Jan-Mar 09

1225

36.3

4.3

59.4

32.0

16.9

5.4

77.8

11.5

Apr-Jun 09

1242

29.1

4.5

66.5

24.6

28.0

4.8

59.4

23.2

Jul-Sep 09

1180

21.1

3.7

75.2

17.4

22.9

3.8

73.4

19.1

Oct-Dec 09

1256

17.1

5.6

77.3

11.6

15.2

4.2

80.6

11.0

Jan-Mar 10

1079

15.5

6.7

77.8

8.8

12.2

6.5

81.3

5.7

Apr-Jun 10

1092

14.3

7.4

78.3

6.9

12.9

6.4

80.7

6.5

Jul-Sep 10

1403

12.0

6.9

81.1

5.1

11.4

7.3

81.3

4.2

Oct-Dec 10

1561

11.6

7.6

80.8

3.9

8.8

7.3

83.9

1.5

Jan-Mar 11

         

9.8

8.1

82.1

1.7

# Due to rounding off percentage may not add up to 100.


Table: 4: Per cent Responses on Sentiments for Capacity Utilisation

(Percentage responses)#

Parameter

Options

Assessment for quarter

Expectations for quarter

July-Sept 2010

Oct-Dec 2010

Oct-Dec 2010

Jan-Mar 2011

1

2

3

4

5

6

Capacity Utilisation (main product)

Increase

34.7

36.8

38.9

39.1

No Change

53.9

54.3

54.5

54.9

Decrease

11.4

8.9

6.6

6.0

Net Response

23.3

27.9

32.3

33.1

Level of Capacity Utilisation (compared to the average in last 4 quarters)

Above normal

14.8

16.0

15.5

17.2

Normal

73.6

73.6

76.3

75.1

Below Normal

11.7

10.4

8.3

7.7

Net Response

3.1

5.6

7.2

9.5

Assessment of Prod. Capacity (with regard to expected demand in next 6 months)

More than adequate

11.2

10.6

12.4

10.6

Adequate

80.8

81.6

80.7

82.2

Less than adequate

8.0

7.8

6.9

7.2

Net Response

3.3

2.9

5.6

3.4


4

III. 1.6. Exports and Imports

The external sector development is gauged in the survey through the assessment and expectation of respondents on Exports and Imports. The survey results show the exports of the manufacturing sector in India grew further in the current survey quarter. The net response for the assessment quarter has increased to 21.2 per cent from 20.0 per cent in previous quarter (Table 6). However, the optimism of Indian manufactures with respect to exports growth is expected to remain at the same level in the expectation quarter.

Table 5: Assessment & Expectations for level of Inventory (Raw Material and Finished Goods)

(Percentage responses)#

Parameter

Options

Assessment for quarter

Expectations for quarter

July-Sept 2010

Oct-Dec 2010

Oct-Dec 2010

Jan-Mar 2011

1

2

3

4

5

6

Inventory of raw material

Below average

6.4

6.2

3.8

4.8

Average

81.9

81.5

85.8

84.8

Above average

11.7

12.4

10.4

10.4

Net Response

-5.3

-6.2

-6.6

-5.6

Inventory of Finished goods

Below average

7.4

6.8

5.8

5.8

Average

81.0

82.5

85.7

85.4

Above average

11.7

10.7

8.6

8.8

Net Response

-4.3

-3.9

-2.8

-3.0

Below average is optimistic


Table 6: Assessment & Expectations for Exports

(Percentage responses)#

Survey Quarter

Total response

Assessment for Current Quarter

Expectation for Next Quarter

Increase

Decrease

No change

Net response

Increase

Decrease

No change

Net response

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Jan-Mar 09

1,225

17.8

34.8

47.4

-17.0

30.6

14.6

54.8

16.0

Apr-Jun 09

1,242

17.4

30.9

51.7

-13.5

19.5

23.3

57.3

-3.8

Jul-Sep 09

1,180

20.9

23.8

55.3

-2.9

20.6

20.5

59.0

0.1

Oct-Dec 09

1,256

27.3

18.1

54.6

9.2

27.0

14.5

58.5

12.5

Jan-Mar 10

1,079

28.9

16.2

54.9

12.7

31.2

11.0

57.8

20.2

Apr-Jun 10

1,092

29.1

13.7

57.2

15.3

30.0

11.5

58.5

18.5

Jul-Sep 10

1,403

31.8

11.8

56.5

20.0

30.8

10.1

59.1

20.7

Oct-Dec 10

1,561

32.6

11.4

56.0

21.2

34.4

8.3

57.3

26.1

Jan-Mar 11

         

34.4

8.1

57.5

26.3

# Due to rounding off percentage may not add up to 100.

The survey reveals lower optimism of the manufacturing sector in terms of growth in imports. The net response on assessment and expectation for higher Imports declined marginally from those in the previous survey quarter (July-September 2010). (Table 7).

III. 1.7. Employment Situation

The Survey seeks responses from the manufacturers about their perceptions on change in employment in their companies covering full-time, part-time and casual labour. About 25 per cent of the respondents have reported addition to their labour force in October-December 2010 quarter which is also reflective of growing Demand condition (Table 8, Chart 6). A similar sentiment prevails for the ensuing quarter as well.

5

Table 7: Assessment & Expectations for Imports

(Percentage responses)#

Survey Quarter

Total response

Assessment for Current Quarter

Expectation for Next Quarter

Increase

Decrease

No change

Net response

Increase

Decrease

No change

Net response

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Jan-Mar 09

1,225

13.7

22.1

64.2

-8.4

19.7

10.6

69.7

9.1

Apr-Jun 09

1,242

17.1

18.4

64.5

-1.3

14.9

16.3

68.8

-1.4

Jul-Sep 09

1,180

21.8

14.0

64.2

7.8

17

12.4

70.6

4.6

Oct-Dec 09

1,256

23.3

10.3

66.5

13.0

21.3

9.8

68.9

11.5

Jan-Mar 10

1,079

25.5

8.4

66.1

17.1

23.4

6.5

70.1

16.9

Apr-Jun 10

1,092

27.7

6.8

65.6

20.9

22.9

5.9

71.2

17.1

Jul-Sep 10

1,403

28.6

6.6

64.7

22.0

27.0

5.4

67.6

21.7

Oct-Dec 10

1,561

27.3

6.4

66.3

20.9

27.3

5.1

67.6

22.2

Jan-Mar 11

         

26.7

5.4

67.9

21.3

# Due to rounding off percentage may not add up to 100.


Table 8: Assessment & Expectations for Employment Outlook

(Percentage responses)#

Survey Quarter

Total response

Assessment for Current Quarter

Expectation for Next Quarter

Increase

Decrease

No change

Net response

Increase

Decrease

No change

Net response

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Jan-Mar 09

1,225

11.2

19.5

69.3

-8.3

16.0

8.3

75.7

7.7

Apr-Jun 09

1,242

11.9

15.2

72.9

-3.3

10.5

15.6

74.0

-5.1

Jul-Sep 09

1,180

14.2

10.1

75.7

4.1

11.5

10.0

78.6

1.5

Oct-Dec 09

1,256

18.2

7.9

73.9

10.3

15.8

7.0

77.2

8.8

Jan-Mar 10

1,079

21.0

7.3

71.7

13.7

18.2

6.1

75.6

12.1

Apr-Jun 10

1,092

21.7

7.0

71.3

14.7

19.5

5.9

74.7

13.6

Jul-Sep 10

1,403

25.1

6.3

68.6

18.7

21.8

5.1

73.1

16.8

Oct-Dec 10

1,561

24.8

5.4

69.9

19.4

24.7

3.6

71.7

21.0

Jan-Mar 11

         

25.0

4.3

70.7

20.6

# Due to rounding off percentage may not add up to 100.


6

III.2. Financial Parameters

The survey assesses sentiments about financial conditions through the following parameters, viz., Overall Financial Situation, Working Capital Finance Requirement (excluding internal sources of funds), Availability of Finance (both internal and external sources), Cost of External Finance, Cost of Raw material, Selling Price and Profit Margin.

III. 2.1. Overall Financial Situation

The financial condition, which moderated during the previous survey round, has reversed and has shown a significant improvement in optimism level in the current survey quarter (Table 9, Chart 7). The net response for the assessment quarter under review increased to 37.1 per cent from 30.6 per cent. The manufacturers also foresee further improvement in the overall financial situation for the expectation quarter as the net response registered a marginal rise to 41.1 per cent from 39.6 per cent.

Table 9: Assessment & Expectations for Overall Financial Situation

(Percentage responses)#

Survey Quarter

Total response

Assessment for Current Quarter

Expectation for Next Quarter

Better

Worsen

No change

Net response

Better

Worsen

No change

Net response

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Jan-Mar 09

1,225

20.3

29.9

49.9

-9.6

31.6

15.2

53.2

16.4

Apr-Jun 09

1,242

26.4

19.4

54.2

7.0

27.8

19.4

52.7

8.4

Jul-Sep 09

1,180

34.3

12.5

53.2

21.8

32.8

12.8

54.4

20.0

Oct-Dec 09

1,256

38.8

9.3

51.8

29.5

40.5

7.0

52.5

33.5

Jan-Mar 10

1,079

42.3

6.5

51.3

35.8

44.3

5.0

50.6

39.3

Apr-Jun 10

1,092

39.1

6.9

54.0

32.2

41.6

5.3

53.1

36.3

Jul-Sep 10

1,403

38.7

8.1

53.2

30.6

39.7

5.6

54.8

34.1

Oct-Dec 10

1,561

42.8

5.7

51.5

37.1

44.9

5.3

49.7

39.6

Jan-Mar 11

         

45.5

4.4

50.1

41.1

# Due to rounding off percentage may not add up to 100.


Table 10: Assessment & Expectations for Working Capital Finance Requirement

(Percentage responses)#

Survey Quarter

Total response

Assessment for Current Quarter

Expectation for Next Quarter

Increase

Decrease

No change

Net response

Increase

Decrease

No change

Net response

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Jan-Mar 09

1,225

36.0

11.9

52.1

24.1

37.9

5.0

57.1

32.9

Apr-Jun 09

1,242

57.0

24.6

9.2

24.6

31.1

7.9

61.0

23.2

Jul-Sep 09

1,180

31.2

7.4

61.4

23.8

32.3

6.0

61.7

26.3

Oct-Dec 09

1,256

35.2

6.4

58.4

28.8

34.7

4.3

61.0

30.4

Jan-Mar 10

1,079

35.8

5.3

58.9

30.5

36.8

4.0

59.2

32.7

Apr-Jun 10

1,092

34.7

4.8

60.5

29.9

31.9

4.3

63.8

27.7

Jul-Sep 10

1,403

35.6

6.3

58.1

29.3

35.2

4.1

60.7

31.1

Oct-Dec 10

1,561

41.3

4.1

54.6

37.1

38.4

3.6

58.0

34.8

Jan-Mar 11

         

40.7

3.0

56.3

37.8

III. 2.2. Working Capital Finance Requirement and Availability of Finance

In line with assessed increase in production, the working capital finance requirement (excluding internal source of funds) for the assessment quarter (October-December 2010) increased with net response rising to 37.1 per cent from 29.3 per cent observed in the previous quarter (July-September 2010). A further increase in the expectation quarter is also anticipated (Table 10).

The survey shows that higher percentage of respondents assesses/expects Availability of Finance to improve in the current/expectation quarter. This is reflected in the net response, which has risen for both the quarters under review (Table 11, Chart 8).

7

Table 11: Assessment & Expectations for Availability of Finance

(Percentage responses)#

Survey Quarter

Total response

Assessment for Current Quarter

Expectation for Next Quarter

Improve

Worsen

No change

Net response

Improve

Worsen

No change

Net response

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Jan-Mar 09

1,225

19.2

21.7

59.1

-2.5

28.7

15.0

56.3

13.7

Apr-Jun 09

1,242

24.8

13.6

61.6

11.2

23.8

14.5

61.7

9.3

Jul-Sep 09

1,180

28.0

8.8

63.2

19.2

27.0

10.4

62.6

16.6

Oct-Dec 09

1,256

30.3

7.2

62.5

23.0

31.7

5.6

62.7

26.1

Jan-Mar 10

1,079

32.1

6.4

61.5

25.7

33.7

4.5

61.8

29.2

Apr-Jun 10

1,092

32.3

5.9

61.8

26.4

31.2

4.4

64.4

26.8

Jul-Sep 10

1,403

32.6

6.0

61.4

26.6

32.9

4.4

62.7

28.5

Oct-Dec10

1,561

35.9

5.6

58.4

30.3

35.3

4.0

60.6

31.3

Jan-Mar 11

         

36.4

4.0

59.6

32.3


Table 12: Assessment & Expectations for Cost of External Finance

(Percentage responses)#

Survey Quarter

Total response

Assessment for Current Quarter

Expectation for Next Quarter

Decrease

Increase

No change

Net response

Decrease

Increase

No change

Net response

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Oct-Dec 09

1,256

9.0

23.8

67.2

-14.7

       

Jan-Mar 10

1,079

7.7

23.6

68.7

-15.9

6.8

25.1

68.1

-18.3

Apr-Jun 10

1,092

7.0

28.9

64.0

-21.9

6.1

26.8

67.1

-20.6

Jul-Sep 10

1,403

5.0

33.2

61.8

-28.3

5.7

29.0

65.3

-23.3

Oct-Dec 10

1,561

4.0

37.9

58.1

-33.9

3.8

32.1

64.2

-28.3

Jan-Mar 11

         

3.7

35.0

61.3

-31.3

Decrease is optimism


8

III. 2.3. Cost of External Finance

The respondents are expressing stronger perception about rise in the cost of funds in the recent past. The survey results reveal that 37.9 per cent of the respondents feel that the cost of external fund have further risen during October-December 2010 (Table 12). One quarter ahead outlook also signals further rise in the cost of funds.

Table 13: Assessment & Expectations for Profit Margin

(Percentage responses)#

Survey Quarter

Total response

Assessment for Current Quarter

Expectation for Next Quarter

Increase

Decrease

No change

Net response

Increase

Decrease

No change

Net response

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Jan-Mar 09

1,225

11.3

48.8

39.8

-37.5

16.9

29.8

53.3

-12.9

Apr-Jun 09

1,242

13.4

38.5

48.1

-25.1

15.4

34.0

50.6

-18.6

Jul-Sep 09

1,180

16.9

32.0

51.1

-15.1

16.0

29.4

54.5

-13.4

Oct-Dec 09

1,256

18.1

28.0

54.0

-9.9

20.2

23.0

56.8

-2.8

Jan-Mar 10

1,079

21.7

24.6

53.9

-2.9

21.1

20.1

58.8

1.1

Apr-Jun 10

1,092

20.2

25.0

54.9

-4.8

22.1

18.9

59.0

3.2

Jul-Sep 10

1,403

21.3

23.9

54.8

-2.5

22.2

19.1

58.7

3.1

Oct-Dec 10

1,561

22.7

23.1

54.2

-0.4

25.2

16.1

58.7

9.2

Jan-Mar 11

         

25.6

17.2

57.2

8.3

# Due to rounding off percentage may not add up to 100.


Table 14: Assessment & Expectations for Cost of Raw Material

(Percentage responses)#

Survey Quarter

Total response

Assessment for Current Quarter

Expectation for Next Quarter

Decrease

Increase

No change

Net response

Decrease

Increase

No change

Net response

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Jan-Mar 09

1,225

29.1

37.2

33.7

-8.1

12.3

48.0

39.7

-35.7

Apr-Jun 09

1,242

14.3

40.6

45.1

-26.3

14.3

30.5

33.7

-16.2

Jul-Sep 09

1,180

8.1

49.8

42.1

-41.7

8.7

35.8

55.5

-27.1

Oct-Dec 09

1,256

6.3

53.4

40.3

-47.1

5.0

43.4

51.6

-38.4

Jan-Mar 10

1,079

2.2

62.3

35.5

-60.2

3.6

47.9

48.5

-44.3

Apr-Jun 10

1,092

2.5

65.2

32.3

-62.7

2.2

50.8

47.0

-48.6

Jul-Sep 10

1,403

3.5

61.8

34.7

-58.3

2.7

52.0

45.2

-49.3

Oct-Dec 10

1,561

2.4

66.3

31.3

-63.9

3.3

52.6

44.1

-49.3

Jan-Mar 11

         

2.3

55.9

41.8

-53.6

# Due to rounding off percentage may not add up to 100.


9

III 2.5. Cost of Raw Material

The survey results indicate continuance of input price pressure for the manufacturing companies in the October-December 2010 quarter (Table 14; Chart 10). A similar trend is seen for the expectation quarter as well.

III 2.6. Selling Price

The survey seeks responses on change in selling prices (ex-factory unit prices) of the manufactured products on aggregate basis. 30.2 per cent of the respondents have been able to pass on a part of rising input cost in the assessment quarter and 26.7 per cent expected the increase in the selling prices to continue for the forthcoming quarter (Table 15, Chart 10).

Table 15: Assessment & Expectations for Selling Price

(Percentage responses)#

Survey Quarter

Total response

Assessment for Current Quarter

Expectation for Next Quarter

Increase

Decrease

No change

Net response

Increase

Decrease

No change

Net response

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Jan-Mar 09

1,225

12.5

38.0

49.5

-25.5

21.2

17.1

61.7

4.1

Apr-Jun 09

1,242

17.0

24.4

58.0

-7.4

14.5

23.6

61.9

-9.1

Jul-Sep 09

1,180

19.4

19.2

61.4

0.2

17.2

17.2

65.6

0.0

Oct-Dec 09

1,256

18.6

15.9

65.5

2.6

19.2

13.2

67.6

6.0

Jan-Mar 10

1,079

24.6

12.2

63.2

12.4

20.7

10.9

68.4

9.8

Apr-Jun 10

1,092

29.3

12.0

58.6

17.3

22.4

9.1

68.5

13.3

Jul-Sep 10

1,403

28.0

14.2

57.8

13.8

24.4

9.2

66.3

15.2

Oct-Dec 10

1,561

30.2

10.0

59.8

20.2

25.7

8.7

65.5

17.0

Jan-Mar 11

         

26.7

8.1

65.2

18.6

# Due to rounding off percentage may not add up to 100.


10

III. 3. Overall Business Conditions

III. 3.1. Overall Business Situation

The Overall Business Situation is a parameter that captures the overall confidence of manufacturing companies. The companies are required to indicate if their overall business situation would improve/ worsen/remain same. The net response about the overall business situation for assessment quarter shows marked improvement to 45.9 per cent from 38.7 per cent in the previous quarter. The net response for expectation quarter has also shown further optimism (Table 16, Chart 11).

11

III.3.2. Business Expectation Index (BEI)

Business Expectation Index gives a single snapshot of the industrial outlook in each study quarter. This index is computed from the weighted average of net responses from all the industries on selected 9 performance parameters where the weights are the industries’ shares in Gross Value Added (GVA). The selected parameters are Overall Business Situation, Production, Order Books, Inventory of Raw Materials, Inventory of Finished Goods, Profit Margin, Employment, Exports, and Capacity Utilisation. Detailed methodology used in index compilation is given in the article Quarterly Industrial Outlook Surveys: Trends since 2001 published in October 2009 Bulletin.

Table 16: Assessment & Expectations of Overall Business Situation

(Percentage responses)#

Survey Quarter

Total response

Assessment for Current Quarter

Expectation for Next Quarter

Better

Worsen

No change

Net response

Better

Worsen

No change

Net response

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Jan-Mar 09

1,225

24.1

35.2

40.7

-11.1

38.6

17.5

43.9

21.1

Apr-Jun 09

1,242

30.7

21.4

47.9

9.3

31.8

20.6

47.6

11.2

Jul-Sep 09

1,180

39.3

13.0

47.7

26.3

38.8

14.6

46.7

24.2

Oct-Dec 09

1,256

46.0

10.1

43.9

36.0

47.2

7.4

45.4

39.8

Jan-Mar 10

1,079

50.5

7.4

42.1

43.1

50.4

5.5

44.2

44.9

Apr-Jun 10

1,092

47.8

7.1

45.0

40.7

47.3

6.1

46.6

41.2

Jul-Sep 10

1,403

46.7

8.0

45.3

38.7

47.6

6.2

46.2

41.5

Oct-Dec 10

1,561

51.4

5.5

43.1

45.9

52.5

5.1

42.4

47.4

Jan-Mar 11

         

54.2

4.1

41.8

50.1

# Due to rounding off percentage may not add up to 100.

The present round of the survey showed further improvement in the index for the assessment quarter. The index has increased to 122.8 for the assessment quarter from 119.0 (Statement 5). However, the same has moderated for the expectation quarter with the index dropping marginally to 125.9 from 126.5 observed in to the previous round (Chart 12). This shows that the manufacturing sector is expected to grow at a slower pace.

III.5. Industry-wise Analysis

Industry-wise analysis shows that Transport Equipment, Other Machinery & Apparatus and Rubber & Plastic industries expressed increased optimism in production for the quarter January-March 2011, whereas Fertilisers, Other Industries and Food Products were less optimistic (Table: 17).

Amongst all the industry groups, Other Industries, Textiles & Cement are least optimistic about their Overall Financial Situation while Transport equipment, Diversified companies and Wood & Wood products industries are more optimistic.

12

The outlook on profit margin on net response basis in industries like Diversified companies, Wood & Wood products and Transport Equipment is more optimistic whereas Textiles and Food products industries are pessimistic.

Among the industry groups, Transport Equipment, Other Machinery & Apparatus and Pharmaceutical & Medicines industries showed a greater inclination towards increasing the number of employees.

Table 17: Industry-wise Analysis

Net Response (%) for January-March 2011

Industry

Production

Overall Financial Situation

Profit margin

Employment

Overall Business Situation

Transport Equipment

72.1

61.3

24.0

37.7

78.5

Wood & wood products

46.7

56.3

25.0

13.3

62.5

Other Machinery & Apparatus

61.1

51.3

12.6

26.3

59.0

Basic Chemicals

50.4

45.5

15.7

19.7

56.9

Basic Metals & Metal products

53.3

44.8

17.1

24.6

54.5

Rubber & Plastic products

59.1

42.2

11.2

25.6

54.4

Electrical machinery

51.1

50.0

7.7

25.8

53.3

Pharmaceutical & Medicines

54.3

40.0

3.1

26.0

52.6

Diversified companies

50.0

57.7

26.9

23.1

50.0

Paper & Paper products

45.5

34.1

12.8

2.3

43.2

Food products

35.5

33.1

-3.3

14.8

41.0

Other industries

30.9

24.2

-2.1

14.5

36.9

Textiles

36.6

28.8

-5.6

12.4

35.8

Cement

40.0

30.0

13.3

10.0

33.3

Fertilisers

25.0

34.4

6.5

3.1

31.3

All Industries

48.6

41.1

8.3

20.6

50.1

Table 17 is indexed based on Overall Business Situation.

The Overall business situation is expected to be optimistic for the industry groups such as Transport Equipment, Wood & Wood products, Other Machinery & Apparatus whereas Fertilisers, Cement, and Textiles indutries are having frail, though positive, expectations.

III.6. Size-wise analysis

Bigger companies (annual production above `1,000 crore/PUC above `100 crore) are more optimistic about overall business and financial situations. The smaller companies (annual production less than `100 crore/PUC less than `10 crore) are less optimistic about demand conditions as their net response on production, order books and capacity utilisation are at lower levels than those of the bigger companies. Bigger companies are more optimistic about domestic as well as external demand (Table 18).

Table 18: Size-Wise Analysis: Annual Production and Paid-up Capital (PUC)

Net Response (%) for January-March 2011

Parameter

PUC-wise

Production-wise

Rd51 Small

Rd52 Small

Rd51 Medium

Rd52 Medium

Rd51 Large

Rd52 Large

Rd51 Small

Rd52 Small

Rd51 Medium

Rd52 Medium

Rd51 Large

Rd52 Large

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

Overall Business Situation

40.9

36.1

48.1

51.5

50.0

57.3

41.8

44.2

52.0

53.6

54.8

62.5

Overall Financial Situation

27.7

26.0

40.4

42.9

49.4

43.2

32.1

32.6

45.5

47.0

50.0

54.3

Working Capital Finance Requirement

33.3

24.0

34.4

39.0

44.6

45.7

30.9

28.3

36.8

44.3

44.1

51.3

Availability of Finance

25.0

18.8

32.2

34.4

31.3

26.6

27.1

25.2

33.7

36.8

40.3

44.4

Cost of External Finance

-16.7

-17.2

-28.5

-32.3

-43.2

-41.8

-22.6

-23.8

-31.4

-35.9

-40.3

-42.9

Production

40.7

35.3

49.6

50.0

59.8

55.9

41.6

42.5

53.1

53.0

64.5

58.0

Order Books

38.1

30.9

44.8

45.1

59.4

53.8

37.3

35.6

49.3

49.8

59.2

55.0

Pending Orders, if applicable

5.1

7.3

1.0

1.3

2.9

-3.8

3.1

4.9

0.4

-0.3

1.7

-2.4

Cost of Raw Materials

-55.8

-57.4

-49.0

-53.4

-43.9

-51.6

-53.8

-57.0

-46.5

-51.0

-46.5

-51.3

Inventory of Raw Materials

-7.0

-7.2

-6.5

-5.2

-9.5

-9.5

-5.2

-2.3

-8.1

-8.7

-6.9

-7.2

Inventory of Finished Goods

2.4

-2.0

-2.9

-3.0

-11.4

-5.6

0.3

-0.3

-4.9

-4.8

-8.5

-7.6

Capacity Utilisation

18.9

20.8

33.5

33.9

37.3

45.1

27.2

28.2

34.9

35.1

44.3

45.6

Level of Capacity Utilisation

-1.5

2.6

7.6

10.0

15.9

16.1

3.3

3.4

9.5

12.8

13.9

22.1

Assessment of the Production Capacity

7.7

3.2

4.8

3.5

11.0

3.3

4.0

2.1

5.0

4.0

15.6

8.1

Employment in the Company

8.5

9.0

22.5

22.3

23.5

20.2

14.9

12.9

24.5

25.2

31.7

34.2

Exports, if applicable

20.0

10.2

26.2

28.2

34.7

28.9

18.3

20.6

28.4

26.9

48.4

48.5

Imports, if any

7.9

9.7

23.5

22.3

24.3

26.5

15.0

15.4

26.0

23.7

33.8

34.3

Selling Prices

18.0

16.2

16.4

18.8

18.8

24.7

16.5

13.7

16.4

22.7

21.8

22.8

If increase expected in selling prices, rate of such increase

19.7

19.4

12.3

13.4

7.9

-2.2

15.2

16.9

11.9

10.3

8.2

10.3

Profit Margin

0.8

-8.3

9.5

9.7

17.6

21.1

2.4

-0.7

13.1

13.4

17.7

23.8

III.7. Constraints for Attaining the Normal Production Level

The survey reveals that 46 per cent of the companies reported constraints for attaining the normal production level during the quarter October- December 2010. The constraints reported are due to Shortage of Raw Materials, Shortage of Power, Shortage of Working Capital Finance, Lack of domestic demand and Lack of export demand. The major industry groups for which higher proportion of companies reported production constraints are Paper & paper products (64 per cent), Textiles (54 per cent), Basic Metals & Metal products (51), Food Products (50 per cent), Rubber and Plastics (48 per cent) and Cement (66 per cent). On the other end of the spectrum, only 29 per cent of the companies in Pharmaceutical & Medicines industry reported production constraints.

Smaller companies, in terms of annual production or paid-up capital, felt more production constraints than the bigger ones.

13

III.9. Survey Results and Official Statistics

The Business Expectations Indices (BEI) based on the information gathered on critical parameters in the Industrial Outlook Survey provides the private manufacturing sector’s aggregate assessment of the current quarter and outlook for the ensuing quarter. Chart 13 shows the co-movements of annual growth rates of quarterly GDP-Manufacturing, IIPManufacturing and the BEI-based on assessment and expectations.

Statement 1: Assessment of the Industrial performance for the October-December 2010 & Expectations of the Industrial Performance for the Quarter January-March 2011

(Percentage of responding companies)#

Parameter

Assessment

Expectations

Optimistic
Response

Pessimistic
Response

No Change

Net
response
(5)=(2)-(3)

Optimistic
Response

Pessimistic
Response

No Change

Net
response
(9)=(6)-(7)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

(9)

1

Overall Business Situation

51.4

5.5

43.1

45.9

54.2

4.1

41.8

50.1

2

Overall Financial Situation

42.8

5.7

51.5

37.1

45.5

4.4

50.1

41.1

3

Working Capital Finance Requirement

41.3

4.1

54.6

37.1

40.7

3.0

56.3

37.8

4

Availability of Finance

35.9

5.6

58.4

30.3

36.4

4.0

59.6

32.3

5

Cost of External Finance *

4.0

37.9

58.1

-33.9

3.7

35.0

61.3

-31.3

6

Production

53.9

10.0

36.0

43.9

55.4

6.8

37.7

48.6

7

Order Books

46.9

9.1

44.0

37.9

49.6

5.6

44.8

44.0

8

Pending Orders, if applicable

11.6

7.6

80.8

3.9

9.8

8.1

82.1

1.7

9

Cost of Raw Materials

2.4

66.3

31.3

-63.9

2.3

55.9

41.8

-53.6

10

Inventory of Raw Materials

6.2

12.4

81.5

-6.2

4.8

10.4

84.8

-5.6

11

Inventory of Finished Goods

6.8

10.7

82.5

-3.9

5.8

8.8

85.4

-3.0

12

Capacity Utilisation

36.8

8.9

54.3

27.9

39.1

6.0

54.9

33.1

13

Level of Capacity Utilisation

16.0

10.4

73.6

5.6

17.2

7.7

75.1

9.5

14

Assessment of the Production Capacity

10.6

7.8

81.6

2.9

10.6

7.2

82.2

3.4

15

Employment in the Company

24.8

5.4

69.9

19.4

25.0

4.3

70.7

20.6

16

Exports, if applicable

32.6

11.4

56.0

21.2

34.4

8.1

57.5

26.3

17

Imports, if any

27.3

6.4

66.3

20.9

26.7

5.4

67.9

21.3

18

Selling Prices

30.2

10.0

59.8

20.2

26.7

8.1

65.2

18.6

19

If increase expected in selling prices, rate of such increase

26.9

11.7

61.4

15.2

23.6

10.5

65.8

13.1

20

Profit Margin

22.7

23.1

54.2

-0.4

25.6

17.2

57.2

8.3

# Due to rounding off percentage may not add up to 100.
* Cost of external finance is included from the round Oct-Dec 2009.


Statement 2: Net Response on Assessment of Industrial Performance Over the Latest Six Quarterly Rounds of the Industrial Outlook Survey

(Per cent)

Parameter

Optimistic
view

July-Sep
2009

Oct-Dec
2009

Jan-Mar
2010

Apr-June
2010

Jul-Sep
2010

Oct-Dec
2010

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

1

Overall Business Situation

Better

26.3

36.0

43.1

40.7

38.7

45.9

2

Overall Financial Situation

Better

21.8

29.5

35.8

32.2

30.6

37.1

3

Working Capital Finance Requirement

Increase

23.8

28.8

30.5

29.9

29.3

37.1

4

Availability of Finance

Improve

19.2

23.0

25.7

26.4

26.6

30.3

5

Cost of External Finance *

Decrease

 

-14.7

-15.9

-21.9

-28.3

-33.9

6

Production

Increase

22.6

28.9

36.5

35.4

40.0

43.9

7

Order Books

Increase

20.5

25.9

31.9

31.3

36.1

37.9

8

Pending Orders, if applicable

Below normal

17.4

11.6

8.8

6.9

5.1

3.9

9

Cost of Raw Materials

Decrease

-41.7

-47.1

-60.2

-62.7

-58.3

-63.9

10

Inventory of Raw Materials

Below average

-2.1

-4.2

-5.8

-5.0

-5.3

-6.2

11

Inventory of Finished Goods

Below average

-4.3

-4.3

-4.3

-4.1

-4.3

-3.9

12

Capacity Utilisation

Increase

10.1

16.5

21.7

21.1

23.3

27.9

13

Level of Capacity Utilisation

Above normal

-11.2

-3.9

3.0

2.5

3.1

5.6

14

Assessment of the Production Capacity

More than adequate

5.8

5.3

6.4

3.1

3.3

2.9

15

Employment in the Company

Increase

4.1

10.3

13.7

14.7

18.7

19.4

16

Exports, if applicable

Increase

-2.9

9.2

12.7

15.3

20.0

21.2

17

Imports, if any

Increase

7.8

13.0

17.1

20.9

22.0

20.9

18

Selling Prices

Increase

0.2

2.6

12.4

17.3

13.8

20.2

19

If increase expected in selling prices, rate of such increase

Increase at lower rate

23.2

19.3

21.6

17.4

15.2

15.2

20

Profit Margin

Increase

-15.1

-9.9

-2.9

-4.8

-2.5

-0.4

* Cost of external finance is included from the round Oct-Dec 2009.


Statement 3: Net Response on Expectations of Industrial Performance Over the Latest Six Quarterly Rounds of the Industrial Outlook Survey

(Per cent)

Parameter

Optimistic
view

Oct-Dec
2009

Jan-Mar
2010

Apr-June
2010

July-Sep
2010

Oct-Dec
2010

Jan-Mar
2010

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

1

Overall Business Situation

Better

39.8

44.9

41.2

41.5

47.5

50.1

2

Overall Financial Situation

Better

33.5

39.3

36.3

34.1

39.6

41.1

3

Working Capital Finance

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Requirement

Increase

30.4

32.7

27.7

31.1

34.8

37.8

4

Availability of Finance

Improve

26.1

29.2

26.8

28.5

31.3

32.3

5

Cost of External Finance *

Decrease

 

-18.3

-20.6

-23.3

-28.3

-31.3

6

Production

Increase

35

40.0

35.9

40.2

49.1

48.6

7

Order Books

Increase

32.3

35.8

33.4

36.3

44.8

44.0

8

Pending Orders, if applicable

Below normal

11

5.7

6.4

4.2

1.5

1.7

9

Cost of Raw Materials

Decrease

-38.4

-44.3

-48.6

-49.3

-49.3

-53.6

10

Inventory of Raw Materials

Below average

-1.2

-3.6

-2.6

-5.1

-6.6

-5.6

11

Inventory of Finished Goods

Below average

-3.7

-1.9

-2.6

-5.0

-2.8

-3.0

12

Capacity Utilisation

Increase

22

25.4

19.7

26.5

32.3

33.1

13

Level of Capacity Utilisation

Above normal

-3.8

1.3

1.6

5.8

7.2

9.5

14

Assessment of the Production Capacity

More than adequate

6.5

5.0

7.1

4.1

5.6

3.4

15

Employment in the Company

Increase

8.8

12.1

13.6

16.8

21.0

20.6

16

Exports, if applicable

Increase

12.5

20.2

18.5

20.7

26.1

26.3

17

Imports, if any

Increase

11.5

16.9

17.1

21.7

22.2

21.3

18

Selling prices

Increase

6

9.8

13.3

15.2

17.0

18.6

19

If increase expected in selling prices, rate of such increase

Increase at lower rate

19.4

16.8

19.7

14.3

13.0

13.1

20

Profit Margin

Increase

-2.8

1.1

3.2

3.1

9.2

8.3

* Cost of external finance is included from the round Oct-Dec 2009.


Statement 4: Comparative Scenarios Pertaining to Assessment for the Current Quarter and Expectations for the Expectation Quarter Based on the Net Responses for all Parameters from a Year Ago, Previous and Current Quarter Surveys (i.e., Round 48, 51 and 52, respectively)

Parameter

Optimistic
view

Net Response (%)

Differences in
net response

Net Response (%)

Differences in
net response

Current
quarter
of a year
ago
survey

Current
quarter
of
Pervious
survey

Current
quarter
of
Current
survey

A year
ago
survey

Pervious
quarter
survey

Current
quarter
of a year
ago
survey

Current
quarter
of
Pervious
survey

Current
quarter
of
Current
survey

A year
ago
survey

Pervious
quarter
survey

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)=(5)- (3)

(7)=(5)- (4)

(8)

(9)

(10)

(11)=(5)- (3)

(12)=(5)- (4)

1 Overall Business Situation

Better

36.0

38.7

45.9

10.0

7.2

44.9

47.5

50.1

5.2

2.7

2 Overall Financial Situation

Better

a29.5

30.6

37.1

7.6

6.6

39.3

39.6

41.1

1.7

1.5

3 Working Capital Finance Requirement

Increase

28.8

29.3

37.1

8.4

7.9

32.7

34.8

37.8

5.0

3.0

4 Availability of Finance

Improve

23.0

26.6

30.3

7.3

3.7

29.2

31.3

32.3

3.2

1.1

5 Cost of External Finance *

Decrease

-14.7

-28.3

-33.9

-19.2

-5.7

-18.3

-28.3

-31.3

-13.1

-3.0

6 Production

Increase

28.9

40.0

43.9

15.0

3.9

40.0

49.1

48.6

8.6

-0.5

7 Order Books

Increase

25.9

36.1

37.9

11.9

1.8

35.8

44.8

44.0

8.2

-0.7

8 Pending Orders, if applicable

Below normal

11.6

5.1

3.9

-7.6

-1.2

5.7

1.5

1.7

-4.0

0.2

9 Cost of Raw Materials

Decrease

-47.1

-58.3

-63.9

-16.7

-5.6

-44.3

-49.3

-53.6

-9.3

-4.2

10 Inventory of Raw Materials

Below average

-4.2

-5.3

-6.2

-2.0

-0.9

-3.6

-6.6

-5.6

-2.0

1.0

11 Inventory of Finished Goods

Below average

-4.3

-4.3

-3.9

0.4

0.4

-1.9

-2.8

-3.0

-1.1

-0.2

12 Capacity Utilisation

Increase

16.5

23.3

27.9

11.4

4.6

25.4

32.3

33.1

7.7

0.8

13 Level of Capacity Utilisation

Above normal

-3.9

3.1

5.6

9.5

2.5

1.3

7.2

9.5

8.2

2.3

14 Assessment of the Production Capacity

More than adequate

5.3

3.3

2.9

-2.5

-0.4

5.0

5.6

3.4

-1.6

-2.1

15 Employment in the Company

Increase

10.3

18.7

19.4

9.1

0.7

12.1

21.0

20.6

8.6

-0.4

16 Exports, if applicable

Increase

9.2

20.0

23.1

13.9

3.1

20.2

26.1

26.3

6.1

0.2

17 Imports, if any

Increase

13.0

22.0

20.9

7.9

-1.1

16.9

22.2

21.3

4.3

-1.0

18 Selling Prices

Increase

2.6

13.8

20.2

17.6

6.4

9.8

17.0

18.6

8.8

1.6

19 If increase expected in selling prices,rate of such increase

Increase at lower rate

19.3

15.2

15.2

-4.1

0.1

16.8

13.0

13.1

-3.7

0.1

20 Profit Margin

Increase

-9.9

-2.5

-0.4

9.5

2.2

1.1

9.2

8.3

7.3

-0.8

* Cost of external finance is included from the round Oct-Dec 2009.


Statement 5: Business Expectations Index - based on Assessment and Expectations

Quarter

ASSESSMENT

EXPECTATIONS

Index

Change over
previous
quarter

Change over
previous
quarter

Index

Change over
previous
quarter

Change over
previous
quarter

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Oct-Dec 2000

113.9

-2.2

124.4

-1.7

Jan-Mar 2001

115.2

1.3

-7.6

122.5

-1.8

Apr-Jun 2001

109.9

-5.3

-5.3

120.7

-1.8

-4.8

Jul-Sep 2001

108.7

-1.3

-7.4

118.9

-1.8

-7.2

Oct-Dec 2001

100.7

-8.0

-13.2

119.5

0.6

-4.9

Jan-Mar 2002

108.4

7.7

-6.8

105.3

-14.2

-17.3

Apr-Jun 2002

110.8

2.4

0.9

112.3

7.0

-8.5

Jul-Sep 2002

113.2

2.4

4.5

116.7

4.4

-2.2

Oct-Dec 2002

113.8

0.6

13.1

121.2

4.6

1.7

Jan-Mar 2003

118.4

4.6

10.0

119.7

-1.6

14.4

Apr-Jun 2003

109.8

-8.6

-1.0

117.8

-1.8

5.6

Jul-Sep 2003

114.3

4.5

1.1

117.2

-0.7

0.5

Oct-Dec 2003

119.8

5.4

5.9

122.1

4.9

0.8

Jan-Mar 2004

121.4

1.7

3.0

122.2

0.2

2.6

Apr-Jun 2004

118.4

-3.0

8.6

121.5

-0.7

3.7

Jul-Sep 2004

116.9

-1.5

2.6

120.0

-1.5

2.9

Oct-Dec 2004

122.0

5.1

2.2

121.5

1.5

-0.6

Jan-Mar 2005

122.5

0.5

1.1

123.2

1.7

1.0

Apr-Jun 2005

117.5

-5.0

-0.9

120.7

-2.5

-0.8

Jul-Sep 2005

114.9

-2.6

-2.0

119.6

-1.1

-0.4

Oct-Dec 2005

124.3

9.4

2.3

122.7

3.1

1.2

Jan-Mar 2006

120.7

-3.6

-1.8

125.7

3.0

2.5

Apr-Jun 2006

121.8

1.1

4.3

120.5

-5.2

-0.2

Jul-Sep 2006

120.7

-1.1

5.8

126.5

6.0

6.9

Oct-Dec 2006

123.9

3.2

-0.4

125.3

-1.2

2.6

Jan-Mar 2007

127.7

3.8

7.0

126.5

1.2

0.8

Apr-Jun 2007

115.8

-11.9

-6.0

127.5

1.0

7.0

Jul-Sep 2007

118.9

3.1

-1.8

121.1

-6.4

-5.4

Oct-Dec 2007

115.9

-3.0

-8.0

124.4

3.3

-0.9

Jan-Mar 2008

122.8

6.9

-4.9

118.6

-5.8

-7.9

Apr-Jun 2008

116.2

-6.6

0.4

123.2

4.6

-4.3

Jul-Sep 2008

113.4

-2.8

-5.5

122.1

-1.1

1.0

Oct-Dec 2008

104.1

-9.3

-11.8

118.9

-3.2

-5.5

Jan-Mar 2009

82.6

-21.5

-40.2

111.9

-7.0

-6.7

Apr-Jun 2009

99.4

16.8

-16.8

96.4

-15.5

-26.8

Jul-Sep 2009

107.2

7.8

-6.2

109.9

13.5

-12.2

Oct-Dec 2009

112.8

5.6

8.7

116.4

6.5

-2.5

Jan-Mar 2010

118.5

5.7

35.9

120.6

4.2

8.7

Apr-Jun 2010

115.9

-2.6

16.5

119.8

-0.8

23.4

July-Sep 2010

119.0

3.1

11.8

118.8

-1.0

8.9

Oct-Dec 2010

122.8

3.8

10.0

126.5

7.7

10.1

Jan-Mar 2011

 

 

 

125.9

-0.6

5.3


1
1
2

* Prepared in the Division of Enterprise Surveys (erstwhile part of Survey Division) of Department of Statistics and Information Management. The previous article on the subject based on 51st Round (July-September 2010) was published in December 2010 Bulletin.

1 The methodology used for the analysis has been provided in the article Quarterly Industrial Outlook Surveys: Trends since 2001 in October 2009 Bulletin.

RbiTtsCommonUtility

PLAYING
LISTEN

Related Assets

RBI-Install-RBI-Content-Global

RbiSocialMediaUtility

Install the RBI mobile application and get quick access to the latest news!

Scan Your QR code to Install our app

RbiWasItHelpfulUtility

Was this page helpful?