Statement 10: Financing of Gross Fiscal Deficit - As per cent to Total - 2019-20 (BE) - RBI - Reserve Bank of India
83709977
Published on September 30, 2019
Statement 10: Financing of Gross Fiscal Deficit - As per cent to Total - 2019-20 (BE)
(Per cent) | ||||||||||||
State/UT | Market Borrowings | Loans from Centre | Special Securities issued to NSSF | Loans from LIC, NABARD, NCDC, SBI and other Banks | Provident Funds, etc. | Reserve Funds | Deposits and Advances | Suspense and Miscell aneous | Remittances | Others | Overall Surplus (-)/ Deficit (+) | Gross Fiscal Surplus (-)/ Deficit (+) (Col.2 to 12) |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
1. Andhra Pradesh | 91.1 | 3.5 | -3.4 | 3.0 | 5.3 | 0.1 | -0.4 | - | - | -3.4 | 4.3 | 100.0 |
2. Arunachal Pradesh | 151.8 | -5.0 | -8.1 | 50.5 | 73.8 | -48.3 | 20.2 | 1.4 | -86.2 | -107.7 | 57.7 | 100.0 |
3. Assam | 88.5 | 1.0 | -6.8 | 7.6 | 10.7 | - | -5.8 | 1.3 | - | - | 3.6 | 100.0 |
4. Bihar | 99.2 | 9.9 | -11.7 | 9.3 | -0.6 | - | 0.6 | -6.7 | - | - | - | 100.0 |
5. Chhattisgarh | 94.0 | 4.0 | -4.2 | 5.1 | 5.6 | 0.2 | -0.3 | - | - | - | -4.4 | 100.0 |
6. Goa | 31.3 | -0.3 | -4.6 | 1.7 | 5.8 | 2.4 | 6.6 | -11.8 | -4.0 | -0.1 | 73.0 | 100.0 |
7. Gujarat | 82.2 | 6.0 | -11.6 | 7.6 | 0.9 | - | 4.3 | 2.6 | 1.0 | - | 6.9 | 100.0 |
8. Haryana | 99.7 | 0.1 | -4.5 | 4.8 | 2.0 | 1.0 | -5.5 | -0.2 | -0.2 | - | 2.7 | 100.0 |
9. Himachal Pradesh | 57.2 | -0.4 | -7.7 | 3.3 | 17.0 | - | - | - | - | -0.3 | 31.1 | 100.0 |
10. Jammu and Kashmir | 51.4 | -1.0 | - | 2.5 | 18.6 | 0.4 | - | 0.2 | - | 10.4 | 17.7 | 100.0 |
11. Jharkhand | 76.2 | 6.0 | -10.8 | 23.9 | -1.9 | - | 2.9 | -2.6 | 0.7 | 11.7 | -6.1 | 100.0 |
12. Karnataka | 95.4 | -0.1 | -3.9 | 0.4 | 8.2 | -3.2 | -4.1 | - | - | - | 7.2 | 100.0 |
13. Kerala | 80.8 | 5.0 | 3.0 | -0.2 | 18.7 | 0.4 | 0.4 | -13.9 | 0.3 | -0.1 | 5.7 | 100.0 |
14. Madhya Pradesh | 67.8 | 8.2 | 3.3 | 8.5 | 13.7 | -5.8 | 13.0 | -3.2 | -0.3 | - | -5.2 | 100.0 |
15. Maharashtra | 83.8 | -1.0 | -8.9 | 10.9 | 2.0 | 5.7 | 7.2 | 0.2 | -0.3 | -0.2 | 0.6 | 100.0 |
16. Manipur | 15.7 | -2.8 | -3.4 | 2.7 | 7.5 | - | -4.8 | - | - | -1.1 | 86.1 | 100.0 |
17. Meghalaya | 73.1 | 3.0 | -4.2 | 13.9 | 4.9 | - | -1.5 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 9.2 | 100.0 |
18. Mizoram | 83.3 | 1.6 | -2.2 | 19.7 | -33.6 | 0.2 | 18.7 | - | - | -2.3 | 14.7 | 100.0 |
19. Nagaland | 62.3 | - | -1.6 | -3.7 | 55.0 | -0.1 | -1.1 | - | - | -5.1 | -5.8 | 100.0 |
20. Odisha | 81.8 | 1.8 | -5.2 | 16.1 | 5.3 | 11.1 | 4.6 | - | -1.1 | 0.3 | -14.5 | 100.0 |
21. Punjab | 89.5 | 2.8 | -9.4 | -4.7 | 6.5 | 4.4 | -0.6 | - | - | -0.1 | 11.8 | 100.0 |
22. Rajasthan | 87.7 | 11.6 | -4.8 | 1.5 | 9.3 | 1.4 | 5.6 | -0.1 | - | -20.5 | 8.4 | 100.0 |
23. Sikkim | 56.8 | -0.2 | -1.9 | -0.8 | 17.5 | 28.9 | - | - | - | -0.3 | - | 100.0 |
24. Tamil Nadu | 91.9 | 4.2 | -4.1 | 1.6 | 3.7 | 4.2 | -3.8 | 1.0 | - | - | 1.2 | 100.0 |
25. Telangana | 102.1 | 1.8 | -3.4 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 6.7 | -5.8 | - | - | -2.9 | -0.2 | 100.0 |
26. Tripura | 101.8 | -1.5 | -6.6 | 3.6 | 2.8 | -0.1 | 2.8 | 0.3 | -1.7 | - | -1.3 | 100.0 |
27. Uttar Pradesh | 89.4 | -0.2 | -10.9 | 8.9 | 2.6 | 17.0 | -17.2 | 11.1 | -2.6 | -6.5 | 8.2 | 100.0 |
28. Uttarakhand | 103.0 | 1.7 | -5.9 | 1.4 | 2.2 | - | -0.1 | 0.2 | - | -3.7 | 1.1 | 100.0 |
29. West Bengal | 136.6 | 3.6 | -23.3 | -0.1 | 4.8 | -0.5 | 11.3 | - | - | 1.9 | -34.3 | 100.0 |
30. NCT Delhi | - | 24.7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 75.3 | 100.0 |
31. Puducherry | 107.7 | -23.9 | - | -5.6 | -0.4 | - | -0.3 | 158.8 | -16.2 | 21.8 | -141.9 | 100.0 |
All States and UTs | 87.9 | 3.3 | -6.3 | 5.0 | 5.9 | 2.8 | 0.3 | 0.2 | -0.4 | -1.8 | 3.2 | 100.0 |
‘-’ : Nil/Negligible. BE: Budget Estimates. Note: (1) Same as in Appendix Table 9. (2) The detailed break-up of ‘Discharge of Internal Debt’ was not available for Arunachal Pradesh and the same has been included under ‘Others’. The financing items under ‘Internal Debt’ for these states are, therefore, not on a net basis except ‘Others’. (3) ‘Others’ include Loans from other institutions, compensation bonds appropriation to contingency fund, inter-state settlement and contingency fund. Source : Budget documents of the state governments. |
PLAYING
LISTEN
Was this page helpful?