4.1 Overview of Municipal Finances This chapter presents an overview of municipal finances in India. The first section analyses the pattern and trends in municipal finances using all-India fiscal aggregates obtained from secondary sources3 to provide a macro picture across the country . The second, third and fourth sections provide indepth analysis of the structure of municipal finances of select 35 Municipal Corporations (MCs). The analysis is based on data gathered from the budget documents of these selected MCs, covering the period 1999-2000 to 2003-2004. 4.2 Size of the Municipal Sector As per the Report of the Twelfth Finance Commission, India has 3,723 ULBs, of which 109 are MCs, 1432 are municipalities and 2182 are Nagar Panchayats. The total revenue of the municipalities grew from Rs.11,515 crore in 1998-99 to Rs.15,149 crore in 2001-02 at a compounded average growth rate (CAGR) of 9.6 per cent. The total expenditure increased from Rs 12,035 crore to Rs 15,914 crore during the same period, registering a CAGR of 9.8 per cent. In spite of the growth of the municipal sector in the country, it accounts for a very small proportion of both Gross Domestic Product (GDP) (at current prices) as well as revenue and expenditure of the upper tiers of Government. Total revenue of the municipal sector accounts for about 0.75 per cent of GDP of the country. In contrast, the ratio is 4.5% for Poland, 5% for Brazil and 6% for South Africa [Buckley (2005)]. Similiarly, municipal revenue forms a little more than 2 per cent of
Table 13: Revenue Significance of Municipal Sector |
Year |
Municipal |
Percentage |
Relative share of Municipal Revenue |
|
Revenue |
of GDP at |
|
(as per cent of Total Revenue of) |
|
(Rs. Crore) |
Factor Cost |
State Govt. |
Central Govt. |
Combined State & Central Govt. |
1998-99 |
11,515 |
0.72 |
4.4 |
4.1 |
2.5 |
1999-00 |
13,173 |
0.75 |
4.2 |
4.4 |
2.5 |
2000-01 |
14,581 |
0.77 |
4.2 |
4.5 |
2.4 |
2001-02 |
15,149 |
0.73 |
4.1 |
4.2 |
2.3 |
Source : (i) Reports of Eleventh and Twelfth Finance Commission, (ii) Economic Survey, GoI 2004-05. |
combined revenue of State and Central Governments. Total revenue of ULBs has been growing at a lower rate (9.7 per cent during 1998-99 to 2001-02) than the growth of combined revenue of Central and State Governments (10.8 per cent during 1998-99 to 2001-02). This reflected in a marginal decline in the share of municipal revenue in total government revenues from 2.5 per cent in 1998-99 to 2.3 per cent in 2001-02. Table 13 provides an overview of the relative importance of municipal revenues in relation to revenues of the States and the Centre. In terms of total expenditure, the municipal sector accounts for about 0.79 per cent of the GDP of the country. While, municipal expenditure accounts for little over 2 per cent of the combined expenditure of State and Central Governments, it declined further between 1999-2000 and 2001-2002. Table 14 provides an overview
Table 14: Expenditure Significance of Municipal Sector |
Year |
Municipal |
Percentage |
Relative share of Municipal Expenditure |
|
Expenditure |
of GDP at |
(as per cent of Total Expenditure of) |
|
(Rs. Crore) |
Factor Cost |
State Govt. |
Central Govt. |
Combined State & Central Govt. |
1998-99 |
12035 |
0.75 |
4.52 |
4.31 |
2.21 |
1999-00 |
14452 |
0.82 |
4.60 |
4.85 |
2.36 |
2000-01 |
15743 |
0.83 |
4.53 |
4.84 |
2.34 |
2001-02 |
15914 |
0.76 |
4.22 |
4.39 |
2.15 |
Source: (i) Reports of Eleventh and Twelfth Finance Commission (ii) Handbook of Statistics on Indian Economy, RBI 2005-06 |
of the relative importance of municipal expenditure in relation to the expenditures of the States and Centre. 4.3 Finances of Select Municipal Corporations This and subsequent sections undertake indepth analysis of municiple finances based on primary data obtained from the budget
Table 15: Study Sample - Cities with more than 1 million population in 2001 |
S. No. |
Name of the City |
Name of the State |
UA/City Population |
MC Population |
|
|
|
(2001) (million) |
(2001) |
1 |
Greater Mumbai |
Maharashtra |
16.37 |
11914398 |
2 |
Kolkata |
West Bengal |
13.22 |
4580544 |
3 |
Delhi |
Delhi |
12.79 |
9817439 |
4 |
Chennai |
Tamil Nadu |
6.42 |
4216268 |
5 |
Bangalore |
Karnataka |
5.69 |
4292223 |
6 |
Hyderabad |
Andhra Pradesh |
5.53 |
3449878 |
7 |
Ahmedabad |
Gujarat |
4.52 |
3515361 |
8 |
Pune |
Maharashtra |
3.75 |
2540069 |
9 |
Surat |
Gujarat |
2.81 |
2433787 |
10 |
Kanpur |
Uttar Pradesh |
2.69 |
2532148 |
11 |
Jaipur |
Rajasthan |
2.32 |
2324319 |
12 |
Lucknow |
Uttar Pradesh |
2.27 |
2207340 |
13 |
Nagpur |
Maharashtra |
2.12 |
2051320 |
14 |
Patna |
Bihar |
1.71 |
1376950 |
15 |
Indore |
Madhya Pradesh |
1.64 |
1597441 |
16 |
Vadodara |
Gujarat |
1.49 |
1306035 |
17 |
Bhopal |
Madhya Pradesh |
1.45 |
1433875 |
18 |
Coimbatore |
Tamil Nadu |
1.45 |
930882 |
19 |
Ludhiana |
Punjab |
1.40 |
1395053 |
20 |
Kochi |
Kerala |
1.35 |
596473 |
21 |
Visakhapatnam |
Andhra Pradesh |
1.33 |
982940 |
22 |
Agra |
Uttar Pradesh |
1.32 |
1259979 |
23 |
Varanasi |
Uttar Pradesh |
1.21 |
1100748 |
24 |
Madurai |
Tamil Nadu |
1.19 |
928869 |
25 |
Meerut |
Uttar Pradesh |
1.17 |
1074229 |
26 |
Nashik |
Maharashtra |
1.15 |
1076967 |
27 |
Jabalpur |
Madhya Pradesh |
1.12 |
951469 |
28 |
Jamshedpur |
Jharkhand |
1.10 |
570349 |
29 |
Asansol |
West Bengal |
1.09 |
475439 |
30 |
Dhanbad |
Jharkhand |
1.06 |
198963 |
31 |
Faridabad |
Haryana |
1.05 |
1054981 |
32 |
Allahabad |
Uttar Pradesh |
1.05 |
975393 |
33 |
Amritsar |
Punjab |
1.01 |
1011327 |
34 |
Vijayawada |
Andhra Pradesh |
1.01 |
851282 |
35 |
Rajkot |
Gujarat |
1.00 |
967476 |
Source : (i) http://urbanindia.nic.in/mud-final-site/programs/urbandevelopment/nurm.htm Website of MUD (accessed on November 15, 2005); (ii) http://www.censusindia.net/results/millioncities.html Census of India website (last accessed on March 24, 2006) (iii) Secondary sources, including budget documents of the MCs |
documents of 35 major MCs of the country whose population was 1 million and above as per 2001 Census. Table 15 shows the sample of MCs and the States to which they belong. 4.4 Municipal Revenues 4.4.1 Structure of Municipal Revenues The revenue base of MCs can be broadly categorized into: (a) tax revenues, (b) non-tax revenues, (c) assigned (shared) revenue, (c) grants-in-aid, (d) loans and (e) other receipts. Table16 lists out revenue sources under each major revenue head. It may be mentioned that composition as well as relative importance of revenue sources of MCs varies across the States. Table 17 sets out the major components of tax revenue of selected MCs in India. While, property tax is the major revenue source in most of the MCs, octroi is the major source in the MCs of Maharashtra and Gujarat. Octroi has been abolished in all other States excepting Maharashtra and Gujarat. Table 18 illustrates the major user charges and fees levied by the select MCs in India. There is considerable heterogeneity in the levy of user charges by MCs across states.
Table 16: Revenue Sources of Municipal Corporations in India 1998-2002 |
Revenue Head/Category |
Sources of revenue |
Tax revenue |
Property Tax, Octroi, Advertisement Tax, Tax on Animals, Vacant Land Tax, |
|
Taxes on Carriages and Carts |
Non-Tax revenue |
User Charges, Municipal Fees, Sale & Hire Charges, Lease amounts |
Other receipts |
Sundry receipts, Law charges costs recovered, Lapsed deposits, Fees, Fines |
|
& Forfeitures, Rent on Tools & Plants, Miscellaneous Sales etc. |
Assigned (Shared) revenue |
Entertainment Tax, Surcharge on Stamp duty, Profession Tax, Motor Vehicles Tax |
Grants-in-aid |
(i) Plan Grants made available through planned transfers from upper tier |
|
of Government under various projects, programmes and schemes |
|
(ii) Non-Plan Grants made available to compensate against the loss of income |
|
and some specific transfers |
Loans |
Loans borrowed by the local authorities for capital works etc. – HUDCO, |
|
LIC, State and Central Governments, Banks and Municipal Bonds |
|
|
Source: Budgets of Municipal Corporations. |
Table 17: Sources of Major Tax Revenues of Selected Municipal Corporations |
|
in India 1998-2002 |
|
Name of State |
Name of Municipal Corporation |
Major Taxes |
Andhra Pradesh |
Hyderabad |
Property Tax, Profession Tax |
Bihar |
Patna |
Property Tax, Profession Tax |
Delhi |
Delhi |
Property Tax, Advertisement Tax |
Gujarat |
Surat |
Property Tax, Octroi |
Karnataka |
Bangalore |
Property Tax, Advertisement Tax |
Kerala |
Kochi |
Property Tax, Profession Tax |
Madhya Pradesh |
Indore |
Property Tax, Advertisement Tax |
Maharashtra |
Mumbai |
Octroi, Property Tax |
Punjab |
Ludhiana |
Octroi, Property Tax |
Rajasthan |
Jaipur |
Octroi, Property Tax |
Tamil nadu |
Chennai |
Property Tax, Profession Tax |
Uttar Pradesh |
Varanasi |
Property Tax, Advertisement Tax |
West Bengal |
Kolkota |
Property Tax, Advertisement Tax |
|
|
|
Source: Budgets of Municipal Corporations. |
|
Shared tax revenue, which varies in terms of composition and nature across states, also forms significant proportion of MC resources (Table 19). Entertainment tax is an important tax, not levied by the MCs, but collected and assigned to the MCs by State Governments. In Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu, in addition to entertainment tax, profession tax and surcharge on stamp duty are also assigned to local bodies.
Table 18: Sources of Major User Charges and Fees of Selected Municipal |
Corporations in India 1998-2002 |
Name of State |
Name of Municipal Corporation |
User Charges and Fees |
|
|
|
Maharashtra |
Greater Mumbai |
Water Charges, Sewerage Charges, Building |
|
|
Licence Fees |
West Bengal |
Kolkata |
Planning Fees, Car Parking Fees, Mutation |
|
|
Fees |
Karnataka |
Bangalore |
Betterment Charges, Building Licence Fees, |
|
|
Penalty for Late Tax payment |
Orissa |
Bhubaneswar |
Building Licence Fees, Market Fees |
Gujarat |
Surat |
Water Charges, Building-related Fees, |
|
|
Betterment Charges |
Tamil Nadu |
Chennai |
Building Licence Fees, Market Fees, Other |
|
|
Licence Fees, Parking Fees |
Andhra Pradesh |
Hyderabad |
Dangerous and Offensive Trade Licence |
|
|
Fees, Market Fees, Slaughter House Fees |
Uttar Pradesh |
Kanpur |
Building Licence Fees, Market Fees |
|
|
|
Source: Budgets of Municipal Corporations. |
|
Table 19: Sources of Shared Revenues of Selected Municipal Corporations in |
India 1998-2002 |
Name of State |
Name of Municipal Corporation |
Shared Municipal Taxes |
Maharashtra |
Greater Mumbai |
Non-agricultural Assessment Tax, |
|
|
Entertainment Tax |
West Bengal |
Kolkata |
Motor Vehicles Tax, Entertainment Tax |
Karnataka |
Bangalore |
Entertainment Tax, Surcharge on Stamp |
|
|
Duty |
Gujarat |
Surat |
Entertainment Tax |
Tamil Nadu |
Chennai |
Surcharge on Sales Tax, Duty on Transfer |
|
|
of Property, Entertainment Tax |
Andhra Pradesh |
Hyderabad |
Surcharge on Stamp Duty, Profession |
|
|
Tax, Entertainment Tax |
Source: Budgets of Municipal Corporations. |
|
Apart from their own revenue sources, i.e., tax and non-tax revenue sources, the MCs depend upon grants from State Governments. These grants are primarily intended to compensate for the mismatch of functions and finance. Most of the MCs receive financial support in the form of revenue grants from State Governments to meet current expenses. Similiarly, capital grants are also provided for meeting project related expenditure. Table 20 shows the composition of grants-in-aid in selected MCs. In addition to own revenues, shared revenues, user charges & fees and grants-in-aid, loans also constitute an important source of municipal revenues in some ULBs. 4.4.2 Composition and Trends of Municipal Revenues Relative contribution of various components in the total revenue over the years has been presented in Tables 21(a) and 21(b). Between 1999-00 to 2003-04, while the share of non-tax, assigned revenue, non-plan and plan grants improved, the share of tax revenue in total revenue receipts of MCs declined. The average shares of major revenue components (average of 2000-04) based on the data of 35 Municipal Corporations are shown
Table 20: Major Sources of Grants-in-Aid of Selected Municipal Corporations |
in India 1998-2002 |
Name of State |
Name of Municipal |
Grants-in-Aid provided to |
|
Corporation |
Municipal Corporations |
Maharashtra |
Greater Mumbai |
Primary Education Grant and Secondary |
|
|
Education Grant |
West Bengal |
Kolkata |
Dearness Allowance Grant, Grant to |
|
|
Implement Recommendations of Pay |
|
|
Commission and Water Supply, Sewerage |
|
|
and Drainage Grants |
Karnataka |
Bangalore |
Octroi Compensation, Motor-Vehicle Tax |
|
|
Compensation and Family Planning |
|
|
Scheme Grants |
Orissa |
Bhubaneswar |
Salary and Dearness Allowance Grants, |
|
|
Road Development Grant, Primary |
|
|
Education Grant and Secondary |
|
|
Education Grant |
Gujarat |
Surat |
Education Grant, Family Planning Grant |
|
|
and Small Savings Grant |
Tamil Nadu |
Chennai |
Revenue Grant, Contributions and |
|
|
Compensation for Toll |
Andhra Pradesh |
Hyderabad |
Property Tax Compensation, Octroi |
|
|
Compensation, Per Capita Grant, Motor |
|
|
Vehicle Tax Compensation and Road Grant |
Uttar Pradesh |
Kanpur |
Octroi Compensation, Salary Grant, |
|
|
Education Grant (Primary & Secondary |
|
|
Education), Medical Grant, Road Grant |
Source: Budgets of Municipal Corporations. |
|
in the Figure 2. Among the various revenue sources, tax revenue assumes greater importance in terms of both size and share. The
Table 21(a): Composition of Municipal Revenue and Trends |
(Rs.in Lakh) |
Sl. |
Revenue |
1999- |
2000- |
2001- |
2002- |
2003- |
Average |
No. |
component |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
Growth Rate % |
1 |
Tax revenue |
458509 |
554597 |
461895 |
573952 |
599387 |
8.23 |
2 |
Non-Tax revenue |
238670 |
297890 |
296487 |
421422 |
434905 |
17.42 |
3 |
Assigned revenue |
87557 |
115909 |
110146 |
132588 |
131076 |
11.66 |
4 |
Non-Plan grants |
26667 |
34145 |
33341 |
54876 |
50161 |
20.42 |
5 |
Other revenue receipts |
98600 |
86769 |
48024 |
64177 |
63271 |
-6.11 |
|
Revenue Receipts |
910003 |
1089310 |
949893 |
1247015 |
1278800 |
10.18 |
6 |
Plan grants |
16753 |
15665 |
31712 |
30027 |
49898 |
39.20 |
7 |
Loans |
19917 |
47245 |
31805 |
28520 |
32835 |
27.33 |
8 |
Other capital receipts |
11228 |
18101 |
18622 |
25785 |
33948 |
33.55 |
|
Capital Receipts |
47898 |
81011 |
82139 |
84332 |
116681 |
27.89 |
|
Total Receipts |
957901 |
1170321 |
1032032 |
1331347 |
1395481 |
11.04 |
Source: Based on the Budgets of Municipal Corporations. |
Table 21(b): Composition of Municipal Revenue and Trends |
(Per cent to Total) |
Sl.No. |
Revenue component |
1999- |
2000- |
2001- |
2002- |
2003- |
Average % |
|
|
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
|
1 |
Tax revenue |
47.87 |
47.39 |
44.76 |
43.11 |
42.95 |
45.21 |
2 |
Non-Tax revenue |
24.92 |
25.45 |
28.73 |
31.65 |
31.17 |
28.38 |
3 |
Assigned revenue |
2.78 |
2.92 |
3.23 |
4.12 |
3.59 |
3.33 |
4 |
Non-Plan grants |
9.14 |
9.90 |
10.67 |
9.96 |
9.39 |
9.87 |
5 |
Other revenue receipts |
10.29 |
7.41 |
4.65 |
4.82 |
4.53 |
6.34 |
|
Revenue Receipts |
95.00 |
93.08 |
92.04 |
93.67 |
91.64 |
93.08 |
6 |
Plan grants |
1.75 |
1.34 |
3.07 |
2.26 |
3.58 |
2.40 |
7 |
Loans |
2.08 |
4.04 |
3.08 |
2.14 |
2.35 |
2.74 |
8 |
Other capital receipts |
1.17 |
1.55 |
1.80 |
1.94 |
2.43 |
1.78 |
|
Capital Receipts |
5.00 |
6.92 |
7.96 |
6.33 |
8.36 |
8.36 |
|
Total Receipts |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
Source: Based on the Budgets of Municipal Corporations. |
aggregate tax revenue of the 35 MCs constituted 45 per cent of average aggregate total revenue (total receipts), which was followed by non-tax revenue constituting 28 per cent of the average aggregate. 4.5 Municipal Expenditure 4.5.1 Structure of Municipal Expenditure The expenditure incurred by the MCs can be broadly categorized into: (a) revenue expenditure and (b) capital expenditure.
Table 22: Categorisation of Municipal Expenditures |
Expenditure Category |
Expenditure Items |
Establishment expenditure |
Staff salaries, Allowances, wages, Pensions & Retirement benefits etc. |
Administrative expenditure |
Rents, rates & Taxes, Office maintenance, Communications, Books & |
|
periodicals, Printing & stationary, Travel expenditure, Law charges etc. |
Operations & Maintenance |
Power & fuel, Bulk purchases, Stores, Hire charges, Repairs & expenditure Maintenance and Interest payments made on loans |
Capital expenditure |
Buildings, Water supply & Sewerage, Energy/lighting, Solid waste management , Roads, Bridges, Culverts, Causeways, Health & sanitation, Parks and recreation spaces, Furniture & fittings, Tools & plant, Equipment etc., Principal repayments of loans |
Other expenditure |
Miscellaneous expenses not accounted for in the above |
Source: Budgets of Municipal Corporations. |
Further, revenue expenditure broadly comprises (i) establishment expenditure, (ii) administrative expenditure, (iii) operations and maintenance expenditure, and (iv) interest payments on loans; the capital expenditure comprises (i) expenditure on capital formation and (ii) principal repayment. The component of these major expenditure categories are shown in table 22. 4.5.2 Composition and Trends of Municipal Expenditure The composition of aggregate expenditure of the MCs, in terms of the above categories, and trends are shown in Tables 23(a) and 23(b).
Table 23(a): Composition and Trends of Municipal Expenditure |
(Rs.in Lakh) |
Sl. No |
Expenditure component |
1999- |
2000- |
2001- |
2002- |
2003- |
Average |
|
|
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 Rate % |
Growth |
1 |
Establishment and administration expenditure |
279216 |
330414 |
329592 |
411432 |
402550 |
10.19 |
2 |
Operation and maintenance expenditure |
107383 |
128165 |
142174 |
164406 |
154400 |
9.96 |
3 |
Other revenue expenditure |
51830 |
56120 |
55954 |
58190 |
56265 |
2.17 |
4 |
Revenue Expenditure |
438429 |
514699 |
527720 |
634028 |
613215 |
9.20 |
5 |
Capital Expenditure |
96933 |
105942 |
119463 |
124817 |
150424 |
11.76 |
6 |
Other Expenditure (not classified) |
209744 |
266611 |
210685 |
399205 |
470925 |
28.40 |
|
Total Expenditure |
745106 |
887252 |
857868 |
1158050 |
1234564 |
14.34 |
Source: Budgets of Municipal Corporations. |
Table 23(b): Composition and Trends of Municipal Expenditure |
(Percent to Total) |
Sl. No. |
Expenditure component |
1999- |
2000- |
2001- |
2002- |
2003- |
Average% |
|
|
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
|
1 |
Establishment and |
37.47 |
37.24 |
38.42 |
35.53 |
32.61 |
36.25 |
|
administration expenditure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Operation and maintenance expenditure |
14.41 |
14.45 |
16.57 |
14.20 |
12.51 |
14.43 |
3 |
Other revenue expenditure |
6.96 |
6.33 |
6.52 |
5.02 |
4.56 |
5.88 |
4 |
Revenue Expenditure |
58.84 |
58.01 |
61.52 |
54.75 |
49.67 |
56.56 |
5 |
Capital Expenditure |
13.01 |
11.94 |
13.93 |
10.78 |
12.18 |
12.37 |
6 |
Other Expenditure (not classified) |
28.15 |
30.05 |
24.56 |
34.47 |
38.15 |
31.07 |
|
Total Expenditure |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
Source: Budgets of Municipal Corporations. |
The average shares of different components in aggregate expenditure during the period of 2000-04 are shown in Figure 3. Among all the components of municipal expenditure, the expenditures on capital works, establishment & administration, and operations & maintenance assume importance. The establishment & administrative expenditure constituted 36.25 per cent of the aggregate total expenditure, during 2000-2004. Capital expenditure, which is an important component, constituted less than 13 per cent of the total expenditure, during the same period. The above expenditure pattern indicates that the MCs’ spending on capital works has been significantly low which is critical for building civic infrastructure for planned urban development. The under-investment in public works is reflected in inadequate availability of civic amenities such as water supply, sewerage, transportation networks and storm drainage system as discussed in the next chapter. 4.5.3 Expenditure on Public Works The expenditure on public works is an important component of the expenditure incurred by the Municipal Corporations. It includes both the expenditure on capital formation as well as the current expenditure incurred on public works by the MCs. The current expenditure comprises expenditure on staff, administration and operations & maintenance. The trends and compostion of expenditure on public works are shown in Tables 24(a) and 24(b). The total expenditure on all public works of the MCs accounted for 46.5 per cent of the total expenditure, on an average, during 2000-2004. Among the components, expenditures on health & sanitation and street lighting have grown the fastest, followed by expenditures on roads, education and sewerage. The growth in expenditures
Table 24(a): Composition of Expenditure on Public Works and its Trends |
(Rs.in Lakhs) |
Public Works |
1999- |
2000- |
2001- |
2002- |
2003- |
Average |
|
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
Growth |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate % |
Health & Sanitation |
14593 |
33708 |
38339 |
47695 |
49443 |
43.20 |
Water supply |
28803 |
31742 |
34694 |
40792 |
40976 |
9.38 |
Roads |
58730 |
85658 |
83420 |
92270 |
97390 |
14.85 |
Parks & Playgrounds |
72658 |
77040 |
83298 |
88722 |
90533 |
5.68 |
Education |
48500 |
57782 |
60533 |
72218 |
74885 |
11.72 |
Sewerage |
20963 |
22742 |
27783 |
31013 |
32860 |
12.06 |
Solid waste management |
42440 |
50696 |
50886 |
57511 |
57614 |
8.26 |
Energy/lighting |
27436 |
43150 |
32092 |
81495 |
69277 |
42.65 |
All Major Works |
314123 |
402518 |
411046 |
511716 |
512977 |
13.75 |
Source: Budgets of Municipal Corporations. |
Table 24(b): Composition of Expenditure on Public Services and its Trends |
(as Percentage of Total) |
Public Works |
1999- |
2000- |
2001- |
2002- |
2003- |
Average |
|
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
Growth |
Health & Sanitation |
4.65 |
8.37 |
9.33 |
9.32 |
9.64 |
8.26 |
Water supply |
9.17 |
7.89 |
8.44 |
7.97 |
7.99 |
8.29 |
Roads |
18.70 |
21.28 |
20.29 |
18.03 |
18.99 |
19.46 |
Parks & Playgrounds |
23.13 |
19.14 |
20.26 |
17.34 |
17.65 |
19.50 |
Education |
15.44 |
14.36 |
14.73 |
14.11 |
14.60 |
14.65 |
Sewerage |
6.67 |
5.65 |
6.76 |
6.06 |
6.41 |
6.31 |
Solid waste management |
13.51 |
12.59 |
12.38 |
11.24 |
11.23 |
12.19 |
Energy/lighting |
8.73 |
10.72 |
7.81 |
15.93 |
13.50 |
11.34 |
All Major Works |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
As share of Total Expenditure (%) |
42.16 |
45.37 |
47.91 |
44.19 |
41.55 |
44.24 |
Source: Budgets of Municipal Corporations. |
incurred on water supply, parks and play grounds and solid waste management has been relatively modest. The MCs have been assigned some of the essential service delivery functions as defined under the respective Municipal legislations. It was laid down that they shall give primary attention to providing essential services like water supply, sewerage, street lights, solid waste management and public (only primary) health. A disproportionately high spending on non-discretionary items like secondary education or secondary health care may not be desirable, unless an MC has already attained satisfactory levels of services on essential services. The composition of expenditure on various public services in the MCs (shown in Figure 4) clearly indicates that the expenditure incurred on essential municipal functions (obligatory/non-discretionary items) like provision of water supply, drainage, sewerage, health & sanitation and solid waste management has been comparatively lower than the expenditure incurred on non-essential functions (discretionary items) like provision of education and parks. This calls for rationalising the discretionary spending by MCs through suitable guidelines; and to improve public accountability of expenditure through citizen’s charters and social audits which will be discussed in Chapter 6. Although water supply and sewerage functions are handled by separate boards in some metropolitan cities like Delhi, Hyderabad, Bangalore and Chennai, this fact does not affect the findings on municipal expenditures. In fact, the pattern of expenditure on public works, after deducting the corresponding figures for water supply and sewerage, of the above four metropolitan cities, more or less remains the same. 4.6 Summary Observations The municipal sector in India has remained small with its total revenue accounting for about 0.75 per cent of GDP. In terms of both revenue and expenditure they account for a little above 2 per cent of the combined revenues and expenditure of Central Government, State Governments and ULBs. Analysis of the data for 35 major MCs indicated higher growth of expenditure (14.3 per cent) during 200-04 compared to the growth of total receipts (11.0 per cent). Component-wise, tax revenue accounted for 45.2 per cent of total revenue, followed by non-tax revenue (28.7 per cent) during 2000-04. Establishment and administration expenditure accounted for about 36 per cent of total expenditure during 2000-04. Expenditure on public works accounted for about 44 per cent of the total expenditure with expenditure on roads and parks and playgrounds accounting for about 19.5 per cent of the total expenditure. |