Statement 8: Financing of Gross Fiscal Deficit- As Per cent of Total - 2020-21 (RE) - आरबीआई - Reserve Bank of India
83724991
30 नवंबर 2021 को प्रकाशित
Statement 8: Financing of Gross Fiscal Deficit- As Per cent of Total - 2020-21 (RE)
(Per cent) | ||||||||||||
State/UT | Market Borrowings | Loans from Centre | Special Securities issued to NSSF | Loans from LIC, NABARD, NCDC, SBI and other Banks | Provident Funds, etc. | Reserve Funds | Deposits and Advances | Suspense and Miscellaneous | Remittances | Others | Overall Surplus (-)/ Deficit (+) | Gross Fiscal Surplus (-)/ Deficit (+) (Col.2 to 12) |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
1. Andhra Pradesh | 77.1 | 7.3 | -2.2 | 2.1 | 11.3 | -11.2 | 15.1 | -0.1 | – | – | 0.6 | 100.0 |
2. Arunachal Pradesh | 193.4 | -4.0 | 57.4 | 24.7 | 42.0 | -14.8 | -2.7 | 1.3 | -313.8 | -0.6 | 117.0 | 100.0 |
3. Assam | 47.3 | 1.8 | -2.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 | – | 3.6 | 0.3 | -0.4 | – | 42.8 | 100.0 |
4. Bihar | 57.3 | 14.7 | -4.3 | 2.2 | 0.7 | – | -0.9 | -0.2 | – | – | 30.5 | 100.0 |
5. Chhattisgarh | 62.3 | 13.9 | -1.9 | 0.8 | 2.7 | 0.1 | – | – | – | – | 22.0 | 100.0 |
6. Goa | 56.6 | -0.2 | -6.7 | 2.1 | 2.8 | 0.6 | 3.1 | 2.0 | 1.9 | -0.2 | 37.9 | 100.0 |
7. Gujarat | 65.2 | 20.9 | -7.1 | 4.8 | 0.2 | -19.3 | 12.5 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 19.4 | -0.4 | 100.0 |
8. Haryana | 100.2 | -0.9 | -4.0 | -36.7 | 6.1 | -4.3 | -2.1 | -0.3 | 1.0 | -0.9 | 42.0 | 100.0 |
9. Himachal Pradesh | 64.3 | -0.4 | -8.1 | 4.1 | 18.6 | – | – | – | – | -0.3 | 21.9 | 100.0 |
10. Jharkhand | 86.7 | 5.2 | -7.5 | 13.8 | -1.8 | -0.3 | 5.1 | -15.3 | 20.8 | 6.8 | -13.4 | 100.0 |
11. Karnataka | 103.1 | -0.3 | -2.8 | 0.7 | 7.8 | -1.5 | -2.8 | – | – | – | -4.3 | 100.0 |
12. Kerala | 61.8 | 19.9 | 5.7 | 0.3 | 17.2 | -1.3 | 0.6 | -3.8 | 0.1 | -0.3 | -0.2 | 100.0 |
13. Madhya Pradesh | 74.0 | 19.1 | 5.6 | 1.2 | 2.4 | 0.6 | 2.7 | 0.5 | -0.2 | 0.1 | -6.2 | 100.0 |
14. Maharashtra | 100.4 | 0.7 | -6.1 | 7.4 | 2.0 | -9.6 | 4.9 | -0.3 | -0.3 | – | 1.0 | 100.0 |
15. Manipur | 33.2 | -1.2 | -1.4 | 3.4 | -0.4 | – | -2.7 | – | – | -0.8 | 69.9 | 100.0 |
16. Meghalaya | 88.9 | 2.9 | -3.6 | 8.1 | 4.1 | – | -3.7 | -0.3 | -1.8 | – | 5.4 | 100.0 |
17. Mizoram | 31.1 | 8.7 | -0.6 | 5.7 | 0.5 | – | 18.4 | – | – | 0.5 | 35.6 | 100.0 |
18. Nagaland | 47.3 | -0.2 | -0.4 | -0.2 | -11.8 | – | -13.3 | – | – | 5.5 | 73.2 | 100.0 |
19. Odisha | 2.8 | 22.5 | -5.0 | 11.6 | 5.6 | -8.6 | 5.3 | – | 44.6 | 39.9 | -18.8 | 100.0 |
20. Punjab | 88.1 | 30.4 | -6.5 | -4.3 | 0.4 | 2.4 | 1.4 | – | – | – | -12.0 | 100.0 |
21. Rajasthan | 89.3 | 11.1 | -2.7 | -0.3 | 8.6 | -1.7 | 3.9 | -0.3 | – | -11.8 | 3.9 | 100.0 |
22. Sikkim | 64.5 | 9.9 | -0.8 | 1.0 | 7.6 | -1.9 | – | – | – | -0.1 | 19.8 | 100.0 |
23. Tamil Nadu | 78.1 | 10.1 | -1.7 | 2.0 | 3.4 | 0.4 | 5.1 | -0.5 | – | – | 3.0 | 100.0 |
24. Telangana | 92.2 | 0.1 | -1.2 | -0.2 | 2.4 | 1.3 | 5.8 | – | – | -0.2 | – | 100.0 |
25. Tripura | 39.9 | 12.1 | -2.9 | 4.7 | 9.8 | 0.2 | 0.2 | – | -0.5 | – | 36.4 | 100.0 |
26. Uttar Pradesh | 92.3 | 0.1 | -6.3 | 1.7 | 2.2 | – | -3.0 | 11.9 | -0.6 | -5.4 | 7.2 | 100.0 |
27. Uttarakhand | 72.3 | 26.3 | -4.8 | 0.7 | 3.2 | – | -1.5 | 3.0 | -1.4 | 0.2 | 2.1 | 100.0 |
28. West Bengal | 88.8 | 9.6 | -12.1 | – | 4.3 | – | 9.1 | – | – | 0.3 | – | 100.0 |
29. Jammu and Kashmir | 43.3 | -0.5 | – | 2.4 | 6.0 | 2.2 | – | 0.1 | – | 46.0 | 0.6 | 100.0 |
30. NCT Delhi | – | 98.0 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 2.0 | 100.0 |
31. Puducherry | 77.5 | -4.5 | -7.3 | -1.3 | -0.5 | -1.0 | -0.2 | 84.2 | -8.9 | 35.6 | -73.6 | 100.0 |
All States and UTs | 77.8 | 10.0 | -3.3 | 1.2 | 4.5 | -2.9 | 3.6 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 1.9 | 5.5 | 100.0 |
‘–’ : Nil/Negligible. RE: Revised Estimates. Note: (1) Same as in Appendix Table 9. (2) ‘Others’ include Loans from other institutions, compensation bonds appropriation to contingency fund, inter-state settlement and contingency fund. Source: Budget documents of the State governments. Details in methodology. |
प्ले हो रहा है
सुनें
क्या यह पेज उपयोगी था?