Appendix Table 11: Composition of Outstanding Liabilities of State Governments (As at end-March) - RBI - Reserve Bank of India
83685501
Published on April 07, 2016
Appendix Table 11: Composition of Outstanding Liabilities of State Governments (As at end-March)
(Amount in ₹ billion) | |||||||||||||||||||
Year | Market Loans |
Power Bonds | Compe-nsation and Other Bonds |
NSSF | WMA from RBI |
Loans from LIC |
Loans from GIC |
Loans from NABARD |
Loans from SBI and Other banks |
Loans from NCDC |
Loans from Other Institu- tions |
Loans from Banks and FIs |
Total Internal Debt |
Loans and Advan-ces from Centre |
Provid-ent Funds, etc. |
Reserve Fund | Deposit and Advances (Net Balances) |
Contige-ncy Fund |
Total |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 = sum (7 to 12) |
14 = sum (2 to 6)+13 |
15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 = sum (14 to 19) |
2000 | 754.3 | – | 0.7 | 252.5 | 73.3 | 31.0 | – | 43.7 | 31.8 | 13.5 | 51.1 | 171.1 | 1,251.8 | 2,303.3 | 805.2 | 197.7 | 521.9 | 15.3 | 5,095.3 |
2001 | 867.7 | – | 0.6 | 563.5 | 65.6 | 42.2 | – | 65.0 | 43.9 | 14.4 | 126.7 | 292.1 | 1,789.5 | 2,386.6 | 936.3 | 228.7 | 593.3 | 7.1 | 5,941.5 |
2002 | 1,040.3 | – | 0.6 | 902.3 | 94.2 | 50.9 | – | 89.7 | 71.4 | 16.2 | 180.8 | 408.9 | 2,446.3 | 2,495.5 | 1,038.2 | 273.9 | 643.2 | 10.4 | 6,907.5 |
2003 | 1,330.7 | – | 0.6 | 1,391.9 | 25.1 | 66.2 | – | 115.5 | 79.0 | 16.1 | 235.2 | 512.0 | 3,260.3 | 2,491.8 | 1,136.8 | 321.9 | 650.4 | 3.1 | 7,864.3 |
2004 | 1,799.2 | 289.8 | 0.8 | 1,984.5 | 33.8 | 89.7 | 10.1 | 112.9 | 82.2 | 30.7 | 334.1 | 659.6 | 4,767.7 | 1,929.8 | 1,218.4 | 422.2 | 691.2 | 2.5 | 9,031.7 |
2005 | 2,134.8 | 298.8 | 0.8 | 2,822.0 | 15.0 | 119.9 | 9.9 | 82.3 | 94.9 | 15.8 | 356.5 | 679.2 | 5,950.6 | 1,600.5 | 1,308.3 | 523.1 | 752.9 | 5.3 | 10,140.7 |
2006 | 2,289.2 | 315.8 | 0.8 | 3,659.3 | 4.1 | 126.1 | 9.9 | 116.5 | 96.8 | 12.0 | 357.2 | 718.5 | 6,987.7 | 1,570.0 | 1,408.1 | 631.2 | 866.9 | 13.2 | 11,477.2 |
2007 | 2,427.8 | 260.5 | 0.8 | 4,253.1 | 3.0 | 122.0 | 9.7 | 156.2 | 91.8 | 11.2 | 302.5 | 693.4 | 7,638.6 | 1,466.5 | 1,499.2 | 787.6 | 1,010.7 | 13.2 | 12,415.8 |
2008 | 2,985.1 | 231.4 | 0.8 | 4,308.8 | 2.5 | 115.3 | 9.3 | 208.7 | 93.0 | 11.8 | 276.4 | 714.4 | 8,243.0 | 1,451.0 | 1,619.7 | 782.6 | 1,165.9 | 20.7 | 13,283.0 |
2009 | 4,019.2 | 216.9 | 0.8 | 4,319.2 | 3.7 | 108.4 | 9.1 | 274.3 | 91.0 | 11.9 | 283.2 | 777.8 | 9,337.6 | 1,438.7 | 1,774.3 | 839.3 | 1,283.5 | 28.5 | 14,702.0 |
2010 | 5,157.9 | 187.8 | 0.8 | 4,550.2 | 4.8 | 97.0 | 8.8 | 348.1 | 101.6 | 13.2 | 266.0 | 834.8 | 10,736.3 | 1,431.5 | 2,005.6 | 943.5 | 1,345.3 | 24.3 | 16,486.5 |
2011 | 6,040.9 | 144.2 | 0.8 | 4,946.4 | 14.1 | 95.1 | 7.8 | 408.1 | 59.4 | 15.6 | 231.2 | 817.2 | 11,963.7 | 1,441.7 | 2,282.4 | 1,031.7 | 1,536.6 | 33.7 | 18,289.8 |
2012 | 7,411.5 | 115.4 | 0.8 | 4,864.2 | 6.1 | 86.5 | 7.1 | 475.3 | 54.8 | 16.3 | 190.8 | 830.8 | 13,228.7 | 1,435.5 | 2,534.5 | 919.4 | 1,789.8 | 31.4 | 19,939.2 |
2013 | 8,746.0 | 86.7 | 0.8 | 4,867.5 | 5.5 | 79.1 | 6.4 | 541.7 | 49.8 | 15.3 | 159.5 | 851.8 | 14,558.3 | 1,448.1 | 2,793.6 | 1,315.6 | 1,952.3 | 34.5 | 22,102.5 |
2014 | 10,503.7 | 72.3 | 0.8 | 4,892.3 | 14.0 | 72.3 | 5.8 | 604.5 | 35.6 | 19.1 | 150.3 | 887.6 | 16,370.7 | 1,458.1 | 3,058.0 | 1,495.0 | 2,299.9 | 31.0 | 24,712.6 |
2015 RE | 12,692.0 | 29.1 | 1.4 | 5,132.2 | 8.8 | 64.6 | 5.8 | 698.2 | 8.4 | 18.9 | 244.2 | 1,040.0 | 18,903.4 | 1,576.1 | 3,342.0 | 1,506.2 | 2,490.6 | 35.0 | 27,853.4 |
2016 BE | 15,329.9 | 0.6 | 1.4 | 5,097.9 | 10.5 | 56.6 | 5.8 | 820.1 | 7.8 | 18.2 | 317.0 | 1,225.6 | 21,666.0 | 1,720.9 | 3,613.4 | 1,538.9 | 2,467.9 | 36.7 | 31,043.8 |
RE : Revised Estimates. BE : Budget Estimates. '–' : Not applicable/Not available/negligible. Note: 1. From 1997 to 2003, 'Loans from Other Institutions' also includes 'Other Loans' and 'Loans from GIC'. From 2004, 'Loans from Other Institutions' includes 'Other Loans'. 2. As detailed break-up of Discharge of Internal Debt for Arunachal Pradesh was not available, the same has been included under 'Loans from Other Institutions'. 3. Also see ‘Explanatory Note on Data Sources and Methodology’. |
PLAYING
LISTEN
Was this page helpful?